Liudmila Lykova


The article discusses the existing approaches to estimations of tax burden in Russia in comparison with the European countries. Calculations are based on the macroeconomic approach to tax bases estimations used by the European statistical service. Tax burden is evaluated by the implicit tax rates, which are the ratio of the paid taxes and macroeconomic valuation of the respective tax base. The article examines some issues in the allocation of the tax burden on corporate income, labour, and consumption; thus, the implicit tax rates on corporate income, on labour, and on final consumption in Russia and the European countries are examined. The problem of significance of the total amount of tax burden and its allocation between different categories of tax bases (corporate income, personal income, final consumption) is formulated.
It is shown that tax burden at different bases varies sufficiently and differs from the European analogues. Tax burden on corporate income and labour is not very high in comparison with most European countries. But the gap between the statutory and the implicit tax rates on corporate income is too small to provide sufficient incentives to economic actors (for long-term investments). Tax burden on labour mostly lies on employers and creates a noticeable imbalance on the national labour market.
Tax burden on consumption is very close to the highest European levels (estimated without taxes associated with exported energy products). It is shown that if the “exported part” of indirect taxes is taken into account, the burden will move to an extremely high level. The environmental tax burden in the Russian Federation is very low in comparison with the EU countries, and it is mostly created by resource taxes instead of energy taxes, as in Europe.


Barro R.J. Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 98, № 5 Part 2 (Oct. 1990). PP.103-125.

Carey D., Tchilinguirian H. Average effective tax rates on capital, labour and consumption. OECD ECO/WKP (2000) 31. Economic Department WP №258

Chan D., Mintz J. 2013 Annual Global Tax Competitiveness Ranking: Corporate tax Policy at a Crossroads. / University of Calgary, The School of Public Policy Research Papers, Volume 6, Issue 35, November 2013.

Chan D., Mintz J., 2010. “U.S. Effective Corporate Tax Rate on New Investments: Highest in the OECD.” Tax & Budget Bulletin No. 62. Cato Institute, Washington, DC.

Environmental taxes. A statistical guide. Eurostat 2013 edition. European Comission. Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union, 2013.

Heady C. Optimal Taxation as a Guide to Tax Policy. A Survey. Fiscal Studies, vol. 14, №1 (Febr.1993).PP.15-41

Heady C.J. A Diagrammic Approach to Optimal Commodity Taxation . Public Finance, Vol.42, 1987. PP.250-263.

Kubatova K. The impact of implicit rates on corporate tax revenue in EU countries./ Societas et ivrisprovdentia

Lykova L.N. The tax burden in the Russian Economy: is it Excessive or Insufficient? 2014. Economy.Tax.Law. 2014.№.PP.4-11.

Mendoza E.G., A. Razin A. and Tesar L.L. (1994), “Effective tax rates in macroeconomics: cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption”, NBER Working Paper, No. 4864, September.

Sayfieva S. 2012.The Russian tax system: a view from the inside. The Issue of economics. 2012. № 12. PP.116-132.

Сайфиева С. Российская система налогообложения: взгляд изнутри. //Вопросы экономики, 2013. № 13. С.116-132.

Supply-side solution. N. Y., 1983; Supply-side Economics. Hearing before the Task Force on Tax Policy. Wash., 1981.

Tax Reform in EU Member States. 2014 Report. European Commission. Taxation Papers. WP №48-2014.

Taxation trends in the European Union. Eurostat, 2014. P.286.

Turnovsky S.J. Optimal Tax, Debt and Expenditure Policy in a Growing Economy. Journal of Public Economics, Vol.60, №1 (1996). PP.21-44.

World Bank, 2010. Doing Business 2010. The World Bank, Washington, DC., URL:



  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.