The Three Main Western Revolutions and Their Censuses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2017.4.263Abstract
This article considers national censuses in the US, France, and Russia based on new principles and held after their respective revolutions. The authors aim to find out to what extent the authorities succeeded in following enumeration procedures based on international regulations. It is demonstrated that a census is a dialectical process involving the state and the population, requiring reciprocal trust. France had no experience of organising censuses with the exception of those in the country’s American colonies. The gentry wanted to keep control over their lands and would not share information about their population with the central authorities. In postrevolutionary France, the census held during the Jacobin terror was not entirely successful, with the state bureaucracy not being strong enough to organise a coherent census and different revolutionary committees taking uncoordinated measures to register the population. The US, however, had had a number of censuses organised by the British prior to the War of Independence. The first census in the United States was held in 1790 in compliance with the Constitution. As a result, the US has held censuses at decadal intervals ever since, but it faced a number of problems for a considerable amount of time, especially concerning the registering of racial minorities. Russia was at an advantage in that respect since it held the first all-Russian census in 1897 in addition to local censuses and census-like tax revisions. The first all-Soviet census organised after the Revolution and Civil War in 1926 was successful, especially among the ethnic minorities in the polar parts of the country. However, the 1937 census became part of repression measures, with detrimental consequences for the census and census takers alike. The US and Soviet censuses census organised after their respective revolutions were successful: in the former, the census created enthusiasm because it was regarded as an instrument to make the new democracy work, while in the Soviet Union of the 1920s, the census was perceived as a prerequisite for the social and economic modernisation of the new state.
References
Anderson, M. J. (1988). The American Census: A Social History. N. Haven, Yale Univ. Press. 257 p.
Blum, A., Mespoulet, M. (2003). L’anarchie bu reaucratique: Statistique et pouvoir sous Staline. Paris, La Découverte. 372 p.
Constitution of the US (1787). In The United States Constitution [website]. URL: https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst.html (mode of access: 05.04.2017).
Curtis, B. (2001). The Politics of Population: State Formation, Statistics, and the Census of Canada, 1840–1875. Toronto, Univ. of Toronto Press. 385 p.
Desrosières, A. (1998). The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, London, Harvard Univ. Press. 368 p.
Dupaquier, J., Dupaquier, M. (1985). Histoire de la démographie: la statistique de la population des origines à 1914. Paris, Librairie Academique Perrin. 462 p.
Emigh, R. J., Riley, D. J., Ahmed, P. (2015a). Antecedents of Censuses from Medieval to Nation States: How Societies and States Count. N. Y., Palgrave Macmillan. 266 p.
Emigh, R. J., Riley, D. J., Ahmed, P. (2015b). Changes in Censuses from Imperialist to Welfare States: How Societies and States Count. N. Y., Palgrave Macmillan. 267 p.
Federal Census Schedule Information at the Maryland State Archives. In Maryland State Archives [website]. URL: http://guide.mdsa.net/pages/viewer.aspx?page=census (mode of access: 05.04.2017).
Gaponenko, L. C., Kabuzan, V. M. (1961). Materialy sel’skokhozyaistvennykh perepisei 1916–1917 gg. kak istochnik opredeleniya chislennosti naseleniya Rossii nakanune Oktyabr’skoi revolyutsii [Materials of the Agricultural Censuses of 1916 and 1917 as a Source on Russia’s Population on Eve of the October Revolution]. In Istoriya SSSR. No. 6, pp. 102–104.
Glavatskaya, E. (2011). Undaunted Courage: The Polar Census in the Obdor Region. In Anderson, D. G. (Ed.). The 1926/27 Soviet Polar Census Expeditions. N. Y., Oxford, Berghahn Books, pp. 97–117.
Goyer, D. S., Draaijer, G. E. (1992). The Handbook of National Population Censuses – Europe. N. Y., Greenwood Press. 544 p.
Hamilton, M., Inwood, K. (2011). The Aboriginal Population and the 1891 Census of Canada. In Axelsson, P., Sköld, P. (Eds.). Indigenous Peoples and Demography: The Complex Relation between Identity and Statistics. Oxford, N. Y., Berghahn Books, pp. 95–115.
Henry, L., Blayo, Y. (1975). La population de la France de 1740 a 1860. In Population. Vol. 30, pp. 71–122.
Hirsch, F. (1998). Empire of Nations: Colonial Technologies and the Making of the Soviet Union 1917–1939. Doctoral thesis. Princeton, S. n. 195 p.
Jefferson, T. (1986). [Letter] from Thomas Jefferson to David Humphreys, 23 August 1791. In Cullen, C. T. (Ed.). The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 22. 6 Aug. – 31 Dec. 1791. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 61–62. URL: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-22-02-0062 (mode of access: 05.04.2017).
Madison, J. (1961). [Letter] to Thomas Jefferson from James Madison, 14 February 1790. In Boyd, J. P. (Ed.). The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 16. 30 Nov. 1789 – 4 July 1790. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 183–184. URL: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-16-02-0102 (mode of access: 05.04.2017).
Mitchell, B. R. (1998). International Historical Statistics: Europe 1750–1993. L., Macmillan. 959 p.
Schwartz, L. A. (1986). History of Russian and Soviet Censuses. In Clem, R. S. (Ed.). Research Guide to the Russian and Soviet Censuses. N. Y., Cornell Univ. Press, pp. 48–69.
Thorvaldsen, G. (2018). Censuses and Census Takers: A Global History. L. , N. Y., Routledge. 332 p.
Zhiromskaya, V. B., Kiselev, I. N., Polyakov, Yu. A. (1996). Polveka pod grifom “sekretno” : Vsesoyuznaya perepis’ naseleniya 1937 goda [Half a Century of Being Marked as “Secret”: The All-Union Population Census of 1937]. Moscow, Nauka. 152 p.
