Tax expenditure as a problem in intergovernmental relations

Stepan S. Bykov, Horst Zimmermann

Abstract


Tax expenditures are well known in all countries. However, they are of low repute, not only because politicians often use them to disguise relief for interest groups in the tax code, but also because they are seen as less targeted and less efficient than direct expenditure. In this article, two hitherto neglected aspects of tax expenditures are discussed. The first of these is tax shifting and what it implies in terms of outcomes. The second and more important is the problem caused by tax expenditures in the area of intergovernmental relations, which arises from the effects of tax expenditures in the intergovernmental system. In the article, these effects are highlighted and described in detail: (1) vertical effects of tax expenditures, reflecting the impact of tax expenditures on budgets at different levels; (2) horizontal externalities, which characterize the effects of tax expenditures on budgets at the same level; and (3) the negative impact of tax expenditures on equalization processes. All of these effects are systematized in various ways; together, they present a coherent approach for later empirical country studies

Highlights 

1. The effects of tax shifting on tax expenditure are described according to a systematic approach. The outcome of shifting consists in changes in the pattern of the intended beneficiaries

2. Criteria are developed for judging the various vertical effects of tax expenditures in the system of intergovernmental relations. A three-dimensional tax expenditure classification schema was developed in order to systematize these effects

3. Horizontal externalities from tax expenditure within intergovernmental relations are demonstrated in a comprehensive way

4. It is demonstrated that tax expenditures may disturb the intended equalization pattern. For instance, tax expenditures for personal equalization and grants for regional equalization may lead to sizable discrepancies between the outcomes of these two channels

For citation

Bykov S. S., Zimmermann H. Tax expenditure as a problem in intergovernmental relations. Journal of Tax Reform, 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–44. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.1.043

Article info

Received March 2, 2018; accepted April 4, 2018


Keywords


Tax expenditure, tax benefit, incidence, externalities, intergovernmental relations, equalization, horizontal equity, tax competition, tax exporting, expenditure spillovers, expenditure competition, grants, contribution

References


Bykov S., Research plan for the study of the effects of tax expenditure in the intergovernmental relations in the Russian Federation. Irkutsk, 2017. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324441430_Research_plan_for_the_study_of_the_effects_of_tax_expenditure_in_the_intergovernmental_relations_in_the_Russian_Federation
2. Report on federal tax expenditures. Concept, estimates and evaluations. Available at: https://www.fin.gc.ca/taxexp-depfisc/2017/taxexp17-eng.asp
3. Tax expenditure statement 2016. January, 2017. Available at: https://treasury.gov.au/publication/2016-tax-expenditures-statement/
4. 26th subsidy report: federal government report on trends in federal financial assistance and tax benefits for the years 2015 to 2018. Summary report. Berlin, December 2017. Available at: https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Standardartikel/Press_Room/Publications/Brochures/2018-01-24-26th-subsidy-report-summary-download.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=8
5. Laaser C.-F., Rosenschon A. Subventionen in Deutschland bis zum Jahre 2015/2016, Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik, no. 9, Kiel (Institut für Weltwirtschaft), 2016. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/148604.
6. Laaser C.-F., Rosenschon A. Subventionen in Deutschland — aus der Perspektive des Kieler subventionsberichts. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 2017, no. 12, pp. 27–33.
7. Tax benefits and EU state aid control: The problem of and approaches to resolving the conflict of jurisdiction with fiscal autonomy. Publication 03/17, Berlin (Federal Ministry of Finance), 2017. Available at: https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Standardartikel/Ministry/Advisory_Board/2018-02-07-tax-benefits-and-eu-state-aid-control-download.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
8. Burton S. Tax expenditure management — a critical assessment. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2013. 258 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511910142.
9. Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2010. 242 p. DOI: 10.1787/9789264076907-en.
10. Surrey S., McDaniel P. Tax expenditures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985. 303 p.
11. Zimmermann H., Henke K.-D., Broer M. Finanzwissenschaft, 11th ed., Munich (Verlag Vahlen), 2012. 564 p.
12. Musgrave R. A., Musgrave P. B. Public finance in theory and practice, 5th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1989. 627 p.
13. Zimmermann H., Henke K.-D., Broer M. Finanzwissenschaft, 12th ed., Munich (Verlag Vahlen), 2017. 357 p.
14. Stiglitz J. Economics of the public sector. 3rd ed. New York, Norton, 1999. 823 p.
15. Finke K., Heckemeyer J. H., Reister T., Spengel C. Impact of tax rate cut cum base broadening reforms on heterogeneous firms: learning from the German tax reform 2008. Finanzarchiv, 2013, vol. 69, pp. 72–114. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1625225.
16. Bittker B. I. Accounting for federal tax subsidies in the national budget. National Tax Journal, 1969, vol. XXII, pр. 244–261.
17. Surrey S., Hellmuth W. The tax expenditure budget — response to professor Bittker. National. Tax Journal, 1969, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 528–537.
18. Oates W. E. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972. 256 p.
19. Boadway R., Shah A. Fiscal federalism. Cambridge University Press, 2009. 620 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511626883.019.
20. Olson M. The principle of fiscal equivalence: the division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review, 1969, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 479–487.
21. Bykov S. Special economic zones within the context of fiscal federalism. In Majburov I. A., Ivanov Yu. B (eds) Osobye ekonomicheskie zony. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty razvitiya [Special economic zones: theoretical and methodological aspects of development]. Moscow, YuNITI-DANA Publ., 2017. Book 1, pp. 113–124. (In Russ.).
22. Dahlby B. Fiscal externalities and the design of intergovernmental grants. International Tax and Public Finance, 1996, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 397–412.
23. Keen M. Vertical tax externalities in the theory of fiscal federalism. IMF Staff Papers, 1998, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 454–485.
24. Lockwood B. Tax competition and tax coordination under destination and origin principles: a synthesis. Journal of Public Economics, 2001, vol. 81, pp. 279–319. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/workingpapers/2008/twerp567.pdf.
25. Wilson J. D. Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 1999, vol. 52, pp. 269–304.
26. Bykov S. Tax incentives classification as a step for tax expenditure estimation. Izvestiya Baykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Baikal State University, 2013, no. 5, pp. 20–26. Available at: http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20387423.
27. Zimmermann H. Wider den internalisierungszwang. Argumente gegen eine übermäßige Nutzung des Konzepts der externen Effekte. In Eckey H.-F. (ed.) Ordnungspolitik als konstruktive Antwort auf wirtschaftspolitische Herausforderungen. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Paul Klemmer. Stuttgart, 2001. Pp. 319–334.
28. Mieszkowski P. M., Musgrave R. A. Federalism, grants, and fiscal equity. National Tax Journal, 1999, vol. 52, pp. 239–260.
29. Buchanan J. M. Federalism and fiscal equity. American Economic Review, 1950, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 583–599.
30. Bykov S. The role of VAT exemptions in the financing of subfederal expenditures. In: Mayburov I. A., Ivanov Yu. B (eds) Fiskalnyi federalizm. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Fiscal federalism: problems and perspectives of development]. Moscow, YuNITI-DANA Publ., 2015. Pp. 232–244. (In Russ.).
31. Consumption Tax Trends 2014. OECD Publishing, 2014. 180 p. DOI: 10.1787/ctt-2014-en.
32. The distributional effects of consumption taxes in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, 2014. 152 p. DOI: 10.1787/9789264224520-en.
33. Towards a simpler, more robust and efficient VAT. Available at: https://ab.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/1_avrupa_birligi/1_6_raporlar/1_2_green_papers/com2010_green_paper_on_future_of_vat.pdf.
34. VAT in the public sector and exemptions in the public interest: final report for TAX-UD/2009/DE/316. 2011. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/docs/body/vat_public_sector_exemptions_en.pdf.
35. Gendron P. Value-added tax treatment of public sector bodies and non-profit organisations: a developing country perspective. ITP Paper 0514, 2005. Available at: http://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/iib/ITP0514.pdf.
36. Borselli F., Chiri S., Romagnano E. Patterns of reduced VAT rates in the European Union. International VAT monitor, 2012, vol. 23, no. 1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2018.4.1.043

Copyright (c) 2018 Stepan S. Bykov, Horst Zimmermann

eLibrary logoeLibrary logo  DOAJ logo ERIH PLUS logo 

 

© Journal of Tax Reform : ISSN 2414-9497 (online), ISSN 2412-8872 (print)