Lab experiment to investigate tax compliance: the case of future taxpayers' behavior in Russia and Belarus

Anna P. Kireenko, Ekaterina N. Nevzorova, Alena F. Kireyeva, Alena S. Filippovich, Ekaterina S. Khoroshavina

Abstract


The paper aims to examine the internal motivation of taxpayer’s behavior, and the factors affecting tax morale and voluntary tax compliance The authors provide scientific results of the tax experiments in post-Soviet countries (Russia and Belarus). The laboratory tax experiment was carried out in a form of a business game engaging students of various levels of education and background. The controllability of the experiment with the impossibility of material encouragement is ensured in the student’s environment in the form of scores to the final attestation. In order to obtain data on tax behavior motivation, a survey on attitude to tax system was conducted. Respondents (experiment participants) were asked to indicate their level of agreement with defined statements by Likert scale. To assess the differences between two groups of participants (who paid and who do not paid tax), the data obtained as a result of filling out the questionnaire using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Kruskal-Wallis H-test were analyzed. The study results affirmed the hypothesis generated earlier, the personal tax morale influences the national tax system and the tax behavior of an individual. The article proves that the awareness of the ways government spends public revenue and the trust level to the state and tax system itself influence tax behavior directly. The civil awareness on the real state of fiscal distribution increases the trust level to the government among taxpayers and is the essential motivation to pay taxes. The developed methodology may be used in an educational process to increase tax literacy, its further application in the scientific research will allow us to derive evidence-based methods and ways to directly influence tax behavior, which may enlarge the public revenue in the times of an unstable global economy.

Highlights

1. The study reveals that the tax audit affects more the amount of evading taxes than the number of evaders, where an increase of education level helps to reduce tax evasion through citizens, to make an individual more competent and more responsible as a taxpayer

2. Laboratory tax behavior monitoring of students allows us to identify the factors that influence on the real national tax behavior and tax experiments could become a tool for the formation of strategies of interaction between tax authorities and taxpayers in Russia and Belarus

3. The main incentives for paying taxes are the trust towards the government and the tax system and the understanding of the society-oriented character of the state

FOR CITATION

Kireenko A. P., Nevzorova E. N., Kireyeva A. F., Filippovich A. S., Khoroshavina E. S. Lab experiment to investigate tax compliance: the case of future taxpayers' behavior in Russia and Belarus. Journal of Tax Reform, 2018, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 266–290. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.056

ARTICLE INFO

Received August 14, 2018; accepted October 22, 2018


Keywords


tax behavior; attitude to taxes; tax compliance; tax evasion; tax experiment; behavioral economics

References


Schumpeter J. A. History of Economic Analysis. London, Allen & Unwin, 1954. 1283 p.
2. Allingham M. G., Sandmo A. Income Tax Evasion: a Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1972, no. 1, рр. 323–338. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2<
3. Becker G. Crime and punishment: an Economic Approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 1968, vol. 76, pp. 169–217. DOI: 10.1086/259394
4. Slemrod J., Yitzhaki S. Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration. Handbook of public economics, 2002, vol. 3, pp. 1423–1470. DOI: 10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80026-X
5. Sandmo A. The Theory of Tax Evasion: a Retrospective View. National Tax Journal, 2005, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 643–663. DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2005.4.02
6. Radaev V. V. The deformation of the rules and Tax Evasion in the Russian economic activity. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2001, no. 6, pp. 60–79. (In Russ.)
7. Vishnevskii V. P., Vetkin A. S. Tax Evasion: Theory and practice. Donetsk: IEP NAN Ukrainy, 2003. 228 p. (In Russ.)
8. Alm J., McClelland G. H., Schulze W. D. Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 1992, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 21–38. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-M
9. Feld L. P., Frey B. S. Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 2002, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–99. DOI: 10.1007/s101010100032
10. Elffers H. But taxpayers do cooperate! In: Van Vugt M., Snyder M., Tyler T. R., Biel A. (eds) Routledge studies in social and political. Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states and organizations. New York, Routledge, 2000. Pp. 184–194.
11. Long S., Swingen J. The conduct of Tax-Evasion Experiments: Validation, Analytical Methods, and Experimental Realism. In: Webley P., Robben H., Elffers H., Hessing D. (eds) Tax evasion: an Experimental Approach. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991. Pp. 128–138.
12. Frey B. S., Foppa K. Human Behavior: Possibilities Explain Action. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1986, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 137–160. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4870(86)90001-2
13. Pyle D. J. The economics of taxpayer compliance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1991, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 163–198. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.1991.tb00131.x
14. Schmolders G. Survey research in Public Finance-Behavioral Approach to Fiscal Theory. Public Finance, 1970, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 300–306.
15. Strümpel B. The contribution of Survey Research to Public Finance. In A. T. Peacock (ed.) Quantitative Analysis in Public Finance. New York, Praeger, 1969. Pp. 12–32.
16. Lewis A. The Social Psychology of Taxation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1982, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 151–158. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1982.tb00523.x
17. Vogel J. Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An interpretation of Recent Survey Data. National Tax Journal, 1974, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 499–513.
18. Alm J., Torgler B. Estimating the determinants of Tax Morale. Annual conference on taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 2004, vol. 97, pp. 269–274.
19. Alm J., Torgler B. Culture differences and Tax Morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2006, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 224–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2005.09.002
20. Zotova Т. А., Boguslavskyi V. N. Economic behavior of taxpayers in modern Russia: Tax Honesty Formation. Terra Economicus, 2008, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 66–73. (In Russ.)
21. Merculova T. V. The externalities of taxation. Terra Economicus, 2007, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 27–34. (In Russ.)
22. Mayburov I. A. Mass opportunism of taxpayers as a consequence of lack of tax morale in our society. Nalogi i finansovoe pravo = Taxes and Financial Law, 2012, no. 9, pp. 179–192. (In Russ.)
23. Fedotov D. Yu. The role of taxes in Russian National Security. Journal of Tax Reform, 2017, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–17. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2017.3.1.027
24. Smith V. L. Papers in Experimental Economics. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991. 795 p.
25. Mascagni G. From the lab to the field: a review of Tax Experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2017, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 273–301. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12201
26. Friedland N., Maital S., Rutenberg A. A simulation study of income tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 1978, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 107–116. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(78)90008-7
27. Alm J. Testing behavioral public economics theories in the laboratory. National Tax Journal, 2010, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 635–658.
28. Mayburov I. A., Leontieva Y. V. Improving the financial literacy of students by using Tax Experiments in the Educational Process. Finance: Theory and Practice, 2017, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 150–159. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2017-21-4-150-159 (In Russ.)
29. Pinskaya M. R., Kireenko A. P. Laboratory experiment in the Tax Evasion Research: the value and Process Methodology. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and Taxation, 2017, no. 7, pp. 56–66. DOI: 10.7256/2454-065X.2017.7.23846 (In Russ.)
30. Koretskaya-Garmash V. A. Taxation awareness and its impact on financial literacy. Journal of Tax Reform, 2017, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 131–142. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2017.3.2.036
31. Kireenko A. P. Methods of investigating taxation in today’s foreign literature. Journal of Tax Reform, 2015, vol. 1, no. 2-3, pp. 209–228. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2015.1.2.013
32. Dobroskok O. V. Tax culture in the Russian Federation. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo = Modern Science: Topical Problems of Theory and Practice. Economics and Law, 2015, no. 7-8, pp. 41–45. (In Russ.)
33. Smith V. L. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. The American Economic Review, 1976, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 274–279.
34. Spicer M. W., Becker L. A. Fiscal inequity and Tax Evasion: an experimental approach. National Tax Journal, 1980, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 171–175.
35. Goksu G. G., Sahpaz K. I. Comparison of Tax Morale of Turkish and Spanish Higher Education Students: The Samples of Sakarya University and the University of Zaragoza. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 186, pp. 222–230.
36. Alm J., Bloomquist K. M., Mckee M. Comparing student and Non-Student Reporting Behavior in Tax Compliance Experiments. In: Plumley A. (ed.) IRS Research Bulletin (Publication 1500). Recent Research on Tax Administration and Compliance. Selected Papers Given at the 2011 IRS-TPC Research Conference: New Perspectives on Tax Administration. (June 22, 2011). Washington, DC, Urban Institute, 2011. Pp. 93–98.
37. Muehlbacher S., Kirchler E. Taxperiments: About the External Validity of Laboratory Experiments in Tax Compliance Research. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 2016, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 7–19.
38. Alm J., Bloomquist K. M., McKee M. On the External Validity of Laboratory Tax Compliance Experiments. Economic Inquiry, 2015, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 1170–1186. DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12196
39. Bloomquist K. M. A Comparative analysis of Reporting Compliance Behavior in Laboratory Experiments and Random Taxpayer Audits. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 2009, vol. 102, pp. 113–122.
40. Bobek D. D., Roberts R. W., Sweeney J. T. The Social Norms of Tax Compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 49–64. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9219-x
41. Kirchler E. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behavior. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007. 264 p.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.056

Copyright (c) 2018 Anna P. Kireenko, Ekaterina N. Nevzorova, Alena F. Kireyeva, Alena S. Filippovich, Ekaterina S. Khoroshavina

eLibrary logoeLibrary logo  DOAJ logo ERIH PLUS logo 

© Journal of Tax Reform : ISSN 2414-9497 (online), ISSN 2412-8872 (print)