Assessment of the effectiveness of anti-COVID tax support for innovation activities of small and medium-sized enterprises in OECD countries

Alina O. Shapovalova, Yuriy B. Ivanov, Victoriia F. Tyschenko, Vlada V. Karpova


The global economy has rebounded from the lows of 2020, but its recovery will depend on innovations. Therefore, it is important to identify the most effective tax support instruments for the innovation activities of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that are used in the framework of anti-crisis economic policies in the OECD countries. It is suggested that tax incentives are the most effective tax instrument of all; the effectiveness of the profit tax benefit depends on the SME’s profitability; as to the social insurance and pension contribution, there is an allowable minimum of the rate, determined by the level of wages, that will stimulate innovation. To assess the effectiveness of tax support tools, the study used the methods of linear multivariate regression and simulation in Simulink. The source of information for regression analysis was the data published by the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). It was concluded that the most effective measures of tax support are tax incentives, as well as deferred payment of social insurance and pension contributions. The 10% profit tax was shown to be optimal to stimulate innovation provided the company keeps the saved profit for development. For innovative SMEs, the minimum allowable contribution rate for social insurance and pension provision, which stimulates their innovative activities, is 12%. The results of modeling confirmed that the proposed threshold indicators for supporting SMEs’ innovation activity can be an effective tool for overcoming the consequences of the global crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

For citation

Shapovalova A.O., Ivanov Yu.B., Tyschenko V.F., Karpova V.V. Assessment of the effectiveness of anti-COVID tax support for innovation activities of small and medium-sized enterprises in OECD countries. Journal of Tax Reform. 2021;7(1):68–86. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2021.7.1.091

Article info

Received January 20, 2021; Revised March 21, 2021; Accepted April 7, 2021


tax incentives, tax support, income tax, social security and pension contributions, innovative activity, small and medium-sized enterprises, COVID-19


Fairlie R. The impact of Covid-19 on small business owners: Evidence of early-stage losses from the April 2020 current population survey. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2020, Working Paper 27309. DOI: 10.3386/w27309
2. Boot A., Carletti E., Kotz H., Krahnen J-P., Pelizzon L., Subrahmanyam M. Corona and financial stability 3.0: Try equity-risk sharing for companies, large and small. Leibniz-Institut für Finanzmarktforschung. 2020, Policy Letter No. 81. Available at:
3. Drechsel T., Kalemli-Ozcan S. A proposal for a negative SME tax. VOX, CEPR Policy Portal. 2020. Available at:
4. Beca M., Cozmei C. Overshadowing the Turmoil Trends: The Swinging Pendulum of SME’s Tax Policies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;109:688–692. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.530
5. Russo B. A cost-benefit analysis of R&D tax incentives. The Canadian Journal of Economics. 2004;37(2):313–335. Available at:
6. Kizim N., Kasyanova L. Classification of Tools of Tax Incentives of Innovations. Problemy ekonomiky = Economic Problems. 2012;(4):23–29. (In Ukrain.) Available at:
7. Castellacci F., Lie C. Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A metaregression analysis. Research Policy. 2015;44(4):819–832. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.010
8. Montmartin B., Herrera M. Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models. Research Policy. 2015;44(5):1065–1079. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
9. Freitas I.B., Castellacci F., Fontana R., Malerba F., Vezzulli A. Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis. Research Policy. 2017;46(1):57–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.002
10. Cappelen A., Raknerud A., Rybalka M. The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations. Research Policy. 2012;41(2):334–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.001
11. Foreman-Peck J. Effectiveness and Efficiency of SME Innovation Policy. Small Business Economics. 2013;41(1):55–70. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-012-9426-z
12. Czarnitzki D., Hanel P., Rosa J-M. Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy. 2011;40(2):217–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017
13. Mitchell J., Testa G., Martinez M.-S., Cunningham Paul N., Szkuta K. Tax incentives for R&D: supporting innovative scale-ups? Research Evaluation. 2020;29(2):121–134. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvz026
14. Falk M. What drives business research and development (R&D) intensity across organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) countries? Applied Economics. 2006;38(5):533–547. DOI: 10.1080/00036840500391187
15. Guceri I., Liu L. Effectiveness of fiscal incentives for R&D: Quasi-experimental evidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2019;11(1):266–291. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20170403
16. Acconcia A., Cantabene C. Liquidity and firms’ response to fiscal stimulus. Economic Journal. 2018;128(613):1759–1785. DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12499
17. Mohnen P., Lokshin B. What does it take for an R&D tax incentive policy to be effective? MERIT Working Papers. 2009, No. 2009/014. Available at:
18. Pless J. Are “Complementary policies” substitutes? Evidence from R&D subsidies in the UK. February 5, 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3379256
19. Busom I., Corchuelo B., Martínez-Ros E. Tax incentives… or subsidies for business R&D? Small Business Economic. 2014;43(3):571−596. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-014-9569-1
20. Corchuelo M. B., Martínez-Ros E. Who benefits from R&D tax policy? Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa. 2010;13(45):145–170. DOI: 10.1016/S1138-5758(10)70027-X
21. Dumont M. Assessing the policy mix of public support to business R&D. Research Policy. 2017;46(10):1851–1862. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.001
22. Huergo E., Moreno L. Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the impact of R&D support programmes. Research Policy. 2017;46(7):1198–1214. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.006
23. Harris R., Qian Cher Li, Trainor M. Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions? Research Policy. 2009;38(1):192–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.016
24. Agrawal A., Rosell C., Simcoe T. Tax credits and small firm R&D spending. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2020;12(2):1–21. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20140467
25. Kasahara H., Shimotsu K., Suzuki M. Does an R&D tax credit affect R&D expenditure? The Japanese R&D tax credit reform in 2003. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 2014;31:72–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2013.10.005
26. Zheng W., Zhang J. Does tax reduction spur innovation? Firm-level evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2021;39:101575. DOI: 10.1016/
27. Ghazinoory S., Hashemi Z. Do tax incentives and direct funding enhance innovation input and output in high-tech firms? The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2020:100394. DOI: 10.1016/j.hitech.2020.100394
28. Rao N. Do Tax Credits stimulate R&D spending? The effect of the R&D tax credit in its first decade. Journal of Public Economics. 2016;140:1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.05.003
29. Guellec D., Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie B. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D*. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2003;12(3):225–243. DOI: 10.1080/10438590290004555
30. Hall B. Tax Policy for Innovation. NBER Working Papers. 2019:25773. Available at:
31. Koga T. Firm size and R&D tax incentives. Technovation. 2003;23(7):643–648. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00010-X
32. Sokolovska A., Rainova L. Tax instruments for stimulating R&D in Europe and the world: design and peculiarities of use. Finansi Ukr = Finance of Ukraine. 2017;(11):65–88 DOI: 10.33763/finukr2017.11.065
33. Thomson R. The effectiveness of R&D tax credits. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2017;99(3):544–549. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00559
34. Cozmei C., Rusu M. The EU tax treatment competition for knowledge based capital– the special case of R&D. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;32:817–825. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01523-3


Copyright (c) 2021 Alina O. Shapovalova, Yuriy B. Ivanov, Victoriia F. Tyschenko, Vlada V. Karpova

eLibrary logoeLibrary logo  DOAJ logo ERIH PLUS logo 

© Journal of Tax Reform : ISSN 2414-9497 (online), ISSN 2412-8872 (print)