Underground economy and GDP growth: Evidence from China’s tax reforms

Yu Kun Wang, Li Zhang


Since 1991, China has implemented two significant tax reforms. The first reform, in 1994, was a large-scale adjustment of the tax distribution system between the central and local governments, and the second reform, in 2012, replaced business tax with value-added tax. Also, the size of China’s underground economy decreased from 13.55% in 1995 to 12.30% in 2016. The paper presents an evaluation of the effect of the two tax reforms and the existing underground economy on GDP growth in China. GDP is defined as explained variable, the explanatory variables include: the ratio of declared income to actual income, the change of concealed income, and the influence of tax rate change on declared income and concealed income. According to the tax reform in 1994 and 2012, two dummy variables are set respectively. In methodology, this paper uses Simultaneous equations model, SUR-OLSs and Slutsky identity. Our estimation is based on the official statistics of China National Bureau of Statistics in the period from 1991 to 2019. In empirical analysis, we decomposed tax changes into tax rate effect (change of budget constraint slope) and income effect (change of tax liability), then analyzed the impact of tax elasticity on GDP growth. The empirical results demonstrate that both the 1994 tax reform and 2012 tax reform have had a positive impact on GDP, with high statistical significance respectively. The results also confirm that the increase of tax rate leads to the increase of hidden income, which eventually leads to the decrease of GDP. The offered methodology can also be applied to most countries for time series analyses.

For citation

Wang Y.K., Zhang L. Underground economy and GDP growth: Evidence from China’s tax reforms. Journal of Tax Reform. 2021;7(1):87–107. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2021.7.1.092


Article info

Received December 15, 2020; Revised February 26, 2021; Accepted March 15, 2021


underground economy; tax evasion; cash deposit ratio; elasticity of taxable income; currency demand; currency transaction


Mirus R., Smith R.S. Canada’s underground economy: Measurement and implications. In: Lippert O., Walker M. (eds) The underground economy: Global evidence of its size and impact. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: The Fraser Institute; 1997, pp. 3–10. Available at: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/UndergroundEconomy.pdf
2. Kolm A. S., Nielsen S. B. Under-reporting of income and labor market performance. Journal of Public Economic Theory. 2008;10(2):195–217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00358.x
3. Buehn A., Schneider F. Shadow economies around the world: Novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estimates. International Tax and Public Finance. 2012;19(1):139–171. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-011-9187-7
4. Dreher A., Schneider F. Corruption and shadow economy: An empirical analysis. Public Choice. 2010;144(1-2):215–238. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-009-9513-0
5. Schneider, F. Shadow economies and corruption all over the world: new estimates for 145 countries. Economics. 2007;1:1–66. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2007-9
6. Medina L., Schneider F. Shadow economies around the world: New results for 158 countries over 1991–2015. CESifo Working Paper No. 6430. Johannes Kepler University of Linz; 2017. Available at: http://www.econ.jku.at/papers/2017/wp1710.pdf
7. Chen H., Sun Q., Schneider F. Measuring the size of the shadow economy in 30 provinces of China over 1995–2016:The MIMIC approach. Pacific Economic Review. 2020;25(3):1–27. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.12313
8. Lewis W.A. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School. 1954;22 (2):139–191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x
9. Kaldor N. Alternative theories of distribution. Review of Economic Studies. 1955;23(2):83–100. DOI: 10.2307/2296292
10. Cagan P. The demand for currency relative to the total money supply. Journal of Political Economy. 1958;66(4):303–328. DOI: 10.1086/258056
11. Allingham M.G., Sandmo A. Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics. 1972;1(3-4):323–338. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
12. Gutmann P.M. The subterranean economy. Financial Analysts Journal. 1977;33(6):26–27. DOI: 10.2469/faj.v33.n6.26
13. Bodemann M., Maier D., Sandru M., Weber G. Risk awareness after the adoption of new steering model in German public administrations– a case study. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015;23:1046–1053. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00540-7
14. Feige E. How big is the irregular economy? Challenge. 1979;22(5):5–13. DOI: 10.1080/05775132.1979.11470559
15. Hutton J.P., Lambert P.J. Evaluating income tax revenue elasticities. Economic Journal. 1980;90(360):901–906. DOI: 10.2307/2231749
16. Adam M.C., Ginsburgh V. The effects of irregular markets on macroeconomic policy. European Economic Review. 1985;29(1):15–33. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(85)90036-4
17. La Porta R., Shleifer A. The unofficial economy and economic development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2008;39(2):275–363. DOI: 10.1353/eca.0.0016
18. Schneider F., Enste D.H. Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature. 2000;38(1):77–114. DOI: 10.1257/jel.38.1.77
19. Lindsey L. Individual taxpayer response to tax cuts: 1982–1984, with implications for the revenue maximizing tax rate. Journal of Public Economics. 1987;33(2):173–206. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(87)90073-9
20. Feldstein M. Tax avoidance and the deadweight loss of the income tax. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1999;81(4):674–680. DOI: 10.1162/003465399558391
21. Brewer M., Saez E., Shephard A. Means-testing and tax rates on earnings. In: Mirrlees J., Adam S., Besley T., Blundell R., Bond S., Chote R., Gammie M., Johnson P., Myles G., Poterba J. (eds) Dimensions of tax design: The mirrlees review. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010, pp. 90–201. Available at: https://www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesreview/dimensions/ch2.pdf
22. Carroll R., Hrung W. What does the taxable income elasticity say about dynamic responses to tax changes? American Economic Review. 2005;95(2):426–431. DOI: 10.1257/000282805774670004
23. Saez E., Slemrod J., Giertz S.H. The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature. 2012;50(1):3–50. DOI: 10.1257/jel.50.1.3
24. Laffer A.B. The laffer curve: Past, present, and future. The Heritage Foundation; 2004. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/taxes/report/the-laffer-curve-past-present-and-future
25. Feldstein M. The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: A panel study of the 1986 tax reform act. Journal of Political Economy. 1995;103(3):551–572. DOI: 10.1086/261994
26. Gruber J., Saez E. The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications. Journal of Public Economics. 2002;84(1):1–32. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00085-8
27. Blomquist S., Selin H. Hourly wage rate and taxable labor income responsiveness to changes in marginal tax rates. Journal of Public Economics. 2010;94(11-12):878–889. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.08.001
28. Matikka T. Taxable income elasticity and the anatomy of behavioral response: Evidence from Finland. Working Paper. No. 55. Government Institute for Economic Research; 2014. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2394466
29. Thoresen T., Vattø T. Validation of the discrete choice labor supply model by the methods of the new tax responsiveness literature. Labour Economics. 2015;37:38–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.09.001
30. Creedy J. The elasticity of taxable income: an introduction. Department of Economics, University of Melbourne; 2009. Available at: https://fbe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/801175/1085.pdf
31. Giertz S.H. Recent literature on taxable-income elasticities (December 2004) . Congressional Budget Office 2004-16. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1092195
32. Creedy J., Gemmell N. The income elasticities of tax revenue: estimates for income and consumption taxes in the United Kingdom. Fiscal Studies. 2004;25(1):55–77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2004.tb00096.x
33. Pirttilä J., Uusitalo R. Veronalennukset vähentävät verotuloja. Kansantaloudellinen Aikakauskirja. 2005;101(4):421–431. Available at: https://www.taloustieteellinenyhdistys.fi/images/stories/kak/kak42005/kak42005pirttila.pdf
34. Mattosa E., Terra R. Nature of transfers, income tax function and empirical estimation of elasticity of taxable income for Brazil. Applied Economics. 2016;48(53):5201–5220. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1173181
35. Zellner A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1962;57:348–368.
36. Griffiths W.E., Hill R.C., Judge G.G. Learning and practicing econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1993.
37. Cadavez V.A.P., Henningsen A. The The use of seemingly unrelated regression to predict the carcass composition of lambs. Meat Science. 2012;92(4):548–553. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.025
38. Martin V., Hurn S., Harris D. Econometric modelling with time series. Cambridge University Press; 2013. 159 р.
39. Quandt R.E. Computational problems and methods. In: Griliches Z., Intriligator M.D. (eds). Handbook of Econometrics. North-Holland; 1983. Vol. 1, рр. 699–764.
40. Hancock G.R. Fortune cookies, measurement error, and experimental design. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 2003;2(2):293–305. DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1067644980
41. Kaplan D. Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications; 2008. 272 p. DOI: 10.4135/9781452226576
42. Hemel D.J., Weisbach D. The behavioral elasticity of tax revenue (October 1, 2019). Journal of Legal Analysis (forthcoming). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3462705
43. Doerrenberg P., Peichl A., Siegloch S. The elasticity of taxable income in the presence of deduction possibilities. Journal of Public Economics. 2017;151:41–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.10.001
44. McFadden, D. Revealed stochastic preference: a synthesis. Econ Theory. 2005,26(2):245–264. DOI: 10.1007/s00199-004-0495-3
45. Pickhardt M., Sardà J. The size of the underground economy in germany: a correction of the record and new evidence from the modified-cash-deposit-ratio approach. European Journal of Law and Economics. 2011,32(1):143–163. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-010-9186-7
46. Schneider F., Buehn A., Montenegro C.E. Shadow economies all over the world new estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007 (June 1, 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5356. DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-5356
47. Elgin C., Oztunali O. Shadow economies around the world: Model based estimates. Working Papers 2012/05. Bogazici University; 2012. Available at: http://ideas.econ.boun.edu.tr/RePEc/pdf/201205.pdf
48. Cebula R.C., Feige E.L. America’s unreported economy: Measuring the size, growth and determinants of income tax evasion in the U.S. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2012;57(3):265–285. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-011-9346-x
49. Chetty R. Is the taxable income elasticity sufficient to calculate deadweight loss? The implications of evasion and avoidance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2009;1(2):31–52. DOI: 10.1257/pol.1.2.31
50. Balafoutas L., Beck A., Kerschbamer R., Sutter M. The hidden costs of tax evasion: Collaborative tax evasion in markets for expert services. Journal of Public Economics. 2015;129:14–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.06.003
51. Wang D.H.M., Yu T.H.K., Hu H.C. On the asymmetric relationship between the size of the underground economy and the change in effective tax rate in Taiwan. Economics Letters. 2012;117(1):340–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.041
52. Singer N.M. The use of Dummy variables in estimating the income-elasticity of state income-tax revenues. National Tax Journal. 1968;21(2):200–204.
53. Kennedy P. A Guide to Econometrics. 5th ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2003. 500 p.
54. Ljung G.M., Box G.E.P. On a measure of a lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika. 1978;65(2):297–303. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/65.2.297
55. Box G.E.P, Jenkins G. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Holden-Day; 1976.
56. Sargan J.D. The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica. 1958;26(3):393–415. DOI: 10.2307/1907619
57. Hansen L.P. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica. 1982;50(4):1029–1054. DOI: 10.2307/1912775
58. Becker S.G. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In: G.S. Becker, W.M. Landes (eds) Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. NBER; 1698, pp. 1–54. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c3625/c3625.pdf
59. Tanzi V. Underground economy and tax evasion in the United States: Annual estimates, 1930–80. IMF Staff Papers. 1983;30(2):283–305.
60. Tanzi V. The underground economy in the United States: Estimates and implications. Quarterly Review. 1980;33(135):427–453. DOI: 10.13133/2037-3643/12996
61. Fugazza M., Jacques J.F. Labor market institutions, taxation and the underground economy. Journal of Public Economics. 2004;88(1):395–418. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00079-8

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2021.7.1.092

Copyright (c) 2021 Yu Kun Wang, Li Zhang

eLibrary logoeLibrary logo  DOAJ logo ERIH PLUS logo 

© Journal of Tax Reform : ISSN 2414-9497 (online), ISSN 2412-8872 (print)