Improving tax journal’s international visibility: Findings from literature review and faculty survey

Anna P. Kireenko

Abstract


Russian universities are trying to promote their scientific journals in international citation bases and are making attempts to publish their journals in English. The aim of the study is to examine how can this strategy help to increase the international visibility of Russian tax research and tax journals. The literature review was conducted to investigate the role of scientific journal in faculty’s and university’s ranking. Non-random sampling survey was conducted with on-line questionnaire in September 2021 to examine Russian faculty and academics foreign language publications with connection to their foreign language skills. Based on the literature review we indicated three groups of ranking affecting factors: economic factors (author geographic affiliation, size of university or department, presence of strong business schools, academic training outside), co-authorship (international collaboration, number, gender and quality of co-authors) and individual characteristics (journal’s specialization and quality, faculty’s PHD-affiliation and language skills). We found that 95% of the survey participants have publications in foreign language. The significant relationship between the number of publications and the level of language proficiency exists only for participants who have more than 30 foreign language publications. The 89% of respondents who indicated that they never use a foreign language in their professional activities also have foreign language publications, and 15% of them have publications in journals Web of Science and Scopus (Q1 and Q2). Our findings indicated that the lack of language proficiency is not the main handicap for progression of the Russian research and journals visibility in international level. The main challenge is that we need to direct the research to an audience who might not at all be interested or knowledgeable about the national research context. Based on the obtained results, the recommendations were offered to potential contributors of articles in English and editorial boards.

For citation

Kireenko A.P. Improving tax journal’s international visibility: Findings from literature review and faculty survey. Journal of Tax Reform. 2021;7(3):267–283. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2021.7.3.103

Article info

Received October 7, 2021; Revised November 12, 2021; Accepted December 9, 2021


Keywords


economics journals, economics publishing, tax journals, faculty ranking, university ranking, foreign language publication, language skill

References


Stilwell F. Higher education, commercial criteria and economic incentives. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2003;25(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800305741

Fejes A., Nylander E. The economy of publications and citations in educational research: What about the ‘Anglophone bias’? Research in Education. 2017;99(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717740146

Minakir P. Research results and bibliometrics: Is a contradiction anatagonistic? Journal of the New Economic Association. 2021;50(2):183–190. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2021-50-2-10

Rubinshtein A.Y., Burakov N.A., Slavinskaya O.A. Community of economists and Russian economic journals (sociological measurements VS bibliometric). Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2017. 83 р. (In Russ.)

Rubinstein A.Y., Burakov N.A. The evolution of the paternalistic state: public choice and scientometrics. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2021. 48 р. (In Russ.) (Preprint)

Giannias D., Sfakianaki E. Multicriteria analysis-based total university evaluation: The case of the Greek departments of economics. International Journal of Education Economics and Development. 2011;2(3):245–259. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2011.042404

Fabel O., Hein M., Hofmeister R. Research productivity in business economics: An investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss universities. German Economic Review. 2008;9(4):506–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00450.x

Pitsolanti M., Papadopoulou F., Tselios N. Evaluation of 50 Greek Science and Engineering University Departments using Google Scholar. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04478. 2017.

Kalaitzidakis P., Mamuneas T.P., Stengos T. Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003;1(6):1346–1366. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322752566

Guimaraes P. The state of Portuguese research in economics: an analysis based on publications in international journals. Portuguese Economic Journal. 2002;1(1):3–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-001-0003-7

Mukhopadhyay T., Sarkar S. Rankings of economics journals and departments in India. Working. WP-2010-021. Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research; 2010. Available at: http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2010-021.pdf

King I.P. Rankings of economics departments in New Zealand. Department of Economics, University of Auckland; 2000. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.197.7416&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Davies J.B., Kocher M.G., Sutter M. Economics research in Canada: a long-run assessment of journal publications. Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’économique. 2008;41(1):22–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.00454.x

Macri J., Sinha D. How much influence do economics professors have on rankings? The case of Australia and New Zealand. Applied Economics. 2010;42(12):1559–1567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701721562

Faria J.R., Araujo Jr A.F., Shikida C.D. The citation pattern of Brazilian economists. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo). 2007;37(1):151–166. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612007000100006

Jin J.C. Research productivity in business and economics: South Korea, 1990-2016. East Asian Economic Review. 2019;23(1):89–107. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2019.23.1.357

Kocher M.G., Luptacik M., Sutter M. Measuring productivity of research in economics: A cross-country study using DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2006;40(4):314–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2005.04.001

Tsai A.C. Self-citation and corruption: cross-sectional, cross-country study. Journal of Global Health Reports. 2021;5:e2021058. https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.24588

Aguillo I.F., Granadino B., Ortega J.L., Prieto J.A. Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006;57(10):1296–1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20433

Zuccala A., Guns R., Cornacchia R., Bod R. Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;66(7):1333–1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23267

Sin S.C.J. International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011;62(9):1770–1783.

Graber M., Launov A., Wälde K. Publish or perish? The increasing importance of publications for prospective economics professors in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. German Economic Review. 2008;9(4):457–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00449.x

Oswald A.J. An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: evidence and implications for decision-makers. Economica. 2007;74(293):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00575.x

Kodrzycki Y.K., Yu P. New approaches to ranking economics journals. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 2006;5(1):0000101515153806451520. https://doi.org/10.1515/1538-0645.1520

Fabel O., Hein M., Hofmeister R. Research productivity in business economics: An investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss universities. German Economic Review. 2008;9(4):506–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00450.x

Besancenot D., Huynh K., Serranito F. Co-Authorship and Individual Research Productivity in Economics: Assessing the Assortative Matching Hypothesis. 2015. ffhalshs-01252373 Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/51441076.pdf

Eisend M., Schmidt S. The influence of knowledge-based resources and business scholars’ internationalization strategies on research performance. Research Policy. 2014;43(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.011

Nelson S., Ribeiro A.P., Carvalho V. Network Effects in Knowledge Creation: Evidence from Academia. FEP Working Papers 565. 2015. Available at: http://www.apdr.pt/pej2015/papers/52.pdf

Goodall A.H., McDowell J.M., Singell L.D. Do economics departments improve after they Appoint a top Scholar as Chairperson? Kyklos. 2017;70(4):546–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12148

Li Y., Hu G. Collaborating with management academics in a new economy: Benefits and challenges. Publications. 2018;6(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6010005

Bao Y., Lo M., Mixon Jr F.G. General-interest versus specialty journals: Using intellectual influence of econometrics research to rank economics journals and articles. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2010;25(2):345–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1104

Mavletova A.M. Sociological polls on the Internet: the possibilities of constructing a typology. Sociology: methodology, methods and mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M). 2010;31:115–134. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/soc4m/article/view/3676/3463

Dyachuk A.A., Bocharova Yu.Yu. Professional portrait of the head of the master’s program of a regional university. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after VP Astafieva. 2020;4(54):63–73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25146/1995-0861-2020-54-4-242

Barsukova S.Yu. Russian Informal Practices: Export Option. Book review: Ledeneva A. How Russia really works: the Informal Practices that shaped post-Soviet Politics and business (Cornell University Press, 2006). Economic Sociology. 2008;9(3):93–100. (In Russ.)




Copyright (c) 2021 Anna P. Kireenko

SCOPUS logo eLibrary logoeLibrary logo  DOAJ logo ERIH PLUS logo 

© Journal of Tax Reform : ISSN 2414-9497 (online), ISSN 2412-8872 (print)