Prospects of VAT Administration Improvement in Digitalized World: Analytical Review

Oksana N. Harkushenko


In conditions of integral digitalization, governments may face a shortfall in VAT revenues due to tax avoidance and frauds. Here arise two opposite hypotheses: 1) digital technologies can solve problems with VAT; 2) digital technologies are not capable to do so. The purpose of the study is to conduct an analytical review of the main problems and ways to improve the administration of VAT in the context of the digitalization of the economy. To achieve this, literature on digital technologies in VAT administration was analyzed. The literature sample consists of 25 sources on e-invoicing and 27 sources on blockchain in VAT administration. The main criteria for literature selection are: accessibility and significance of source; time horizon (last 10–15 years); keywords (“e-invoicing”, “blockchain”, “VAT”, “taxation”, “tax administration”); interdisciplinary approach (literature set represent standpoints of experts from different fields). It was established, that there is no consensus about e-invoicing and blockchain in VAT administration. These technologies have both shortcomings and advantages. The main result of the review is this: digital technologies are not a panacea for solving all problems with VAT administration. That is, both hypothesis of this paper is not proved, but not refuted. Digital technologies can simplify and reduce costs on VAT administration, provided there is a developed ICT infrastructure and consistent regulatory framework, a high tax culture, a low level of “shadow” economy. Interaction between countries in terms of the tax information exchange is also crucial. If these conditions are met, digital technologies in taxation can be effectively employed in the next 5–10 years in the most advanced countries; less developed countries will need much more time for this.


digitalization, VAT, tax administration, legal regulation, information and communication technologies, international trade, tax fraud


Hale D. The Evolution of the Property Tax: A Study of the Relation between Public Finance and Political Theory. The Journal of Politics. 1985:47(2):382–404.
2. Tait A.A. Value Added Tax: International Practice and Problems. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund; 1988. 468 p.
3. De la Feria R., Krever R. Ending VAT exemptions: Towards a post-modern VAT. In VAT Exemptions: Consequences and Design Alternatives (Ed. R. De la Feria). Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer; 2013, pp. 3–36.
4. Krougman P., Feldstein M. International trade effects of value-added taxation. In: Taxation in the Global Economy. Razin A., Slemrod J. (eds.). Chicago, Il, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp. 263–282.
5. James K. Exploring the origins and global rise of VAT. In: Phillips C. (eds). The VAT Reader: What a Federal Consumption Tax Would Mean for America. Arlington: Tax Analysts; 2011, pp. 15–22.
6. Martin J.W. The Social Aspects of Tax Exemption. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1936;183:48–56.
7. Dietl H., Jaag C., Lang M., Trinkner Urs. Competition and welfare effects of VAT exemptions. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis Policy. 2011;11(1):19.
8. Bettendorf L., Cnossen S. The Long Arm of the European VAT, Exemplified by the Dutch Experience. CESifo Working Paper No. 4730. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo); 2014. 24 p.
9. Harkushenko O. Possibilities of the VAT reverse charge mechanism implementation in Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine. 2015;5:81–91. (In Ukr.).
10. Lummus R.R., Vokurka R.J. Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 1999;99(1):11–17.
11. Lamensch M., Ceci E. VAT fraud: Economic impact, challenges and policy issues. Brussel: European Union; 2018. 74 p.
12. EESPA, TrustWeaver. Tax-Compliant Global Electronic Invoice Lifecycle Management. A TrustWeaver White Paper. October 2016. 70 p.
13. Estevadeordal A., Chatruc M. R., Martincus C. V. New technologies and trade: new determinants, modalities, and varieties. Inter-American Development Bank Discussion paper IDB-DP-00746. 2020. 42 p.
14. Hui K.L., Chau P.Y. Classifying digital products. Communications of the ACM; 2002;45(6):73–79.
15. Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R.D., Marsden J.R., Sankaranarayanan R. Digital goods and markets: Emerging issues and challenges. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS). 2011;2(2):1–14.
16. Aslam A., Shah A. Taxing the Digital Economy. In: de Mooij R.A., Klemm A.D., Perry V.J. (eds).Corporate Income Taxes under Pressure. Why Reform Is Needed and How It Could Be Designed. Washington, USA: International Monetary Fund; 2021, pp. 189–226. 388 p.
17. Carpentieri L., Micossi S., Parascandolo P. Overhauling corporate taxation in the digital economy. CEPS Policy Insights; 2019. No 2019-15/October 2019. 20 p.
18. Pomeranz D. No Taxation without Information: Deterrence and Self-Enforcement in the Value Added Tax. American Economic Review. 2015;105(8):2539–2569.
19. Veselá L., Radiměřský M. The development of electronic document exchange. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014;12:743–751.
20. Koch B. The E-Invoicing journey 2019–2025. Billentis. September, 2019. 184 p.
21. Koch B. E-Invoicing/E-Billing. Significant market transition lies ahead. Billentis. May, 2017. 151 p.
22. De Lima G. A. National report on e-commerce development in Brazil. Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series WP 14/2017. 2017. 48 р.
23. De Mello N. O., Dias E. M., Fontana C. F., Fernandez M. L. A. The implementation of the electronic tax documents in Brazil as a tool to fight tax evasion. In Proceedings of the 13th WSEAS International Conference on Systems. 2009, pp. 449–456.
24. Krever R. Combating VAT Fraud: Lessons from Korea? British Tax Review. 2014;(3):329–341.
25. Lee H.C. Can electronic tax invoicing improve tax compliance? A case study of the Republic of Korea’s electronic tax invoicing for value-added tax. A Case Study of the Republic of Korea’s Electronic Tax Invoicing for Value-Added Tax. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7592 (2016). March 7, 2016. 58 p.
26. Ainsworth R.T., Alwohaibi M., Cheetham M., Tirand C. A VATCoin Solution to MTIC Fraud: Past Efforts, Present Technology, and the EU’s 2017 Proposal. Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No 18-08; 2018. 36 р.
27. Synyutka N., Krysovata K. Fiscal dysfunction of vat electronic invoicing in Ukraine. World of Finance. 2019;4(61):23–36. (In Ukr.).
28. Zhang Bin, Wang Shuhua. The Influence of Electronic Invoice on Tax Collection and Tax Reform in China. Journal of Tax Reform. 2017;3(3):158–169.
29. Alkhodre A., Jan S., Khusro S., Ali T., Alsaawy Y., Yasar M. A blockchain-based value added tax (VAT) system: Saudi Arabia as a use-case. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 2019;10(9):708–716.
30. Joshi P.R., Islam S., Islam S. A framework for cloud based e-government from the perspective of developing countries. Future Internet. 2017;9(4):80–106.
31. Palupi C., Darwanto D. Transaction Cost on the Implementation of E-Invoices in Micro and Small Enterprises. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi. 2017;6(1):139–158.
32. Olbert M., Spengel C. Taxation in the Digital Economy–Recent Policy Developments and the Question of Value Creation. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper no 9-010, 2019. 35 р.
33. Terada-Hagiwara A., Gonzales K., Wang J. Taxation Challenges in a Digital Economy– The Case of the People’s Republic of China. ADB Briefs. 2019;108:8.
34. OECD. Technology Tools to Tackle Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. 60 p.
35. Sung M.J., Awasthi R., Lee H.C. Can Tax Incentives for Electronic Payments Reduce the Shadow Economy? Korea’s Attempt to Reduce Underreporting in Retail Businesses. Policy Research working paper, no. WPS 7936. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group; 2017. 55 p.
36. Vishnevsky V.P., Chekina V.D. Robot vs. tax inspector or how the fourth industrial revolution will change the tax system: a review of problems and solutions. Journal of Tax Reform. 2018;4(1):6–26.
37. Vishnevsky V.P., Harkushenko O.M., Zanizdra M.Yu., Kniaziev S.I., Lypnytskyi D.V., Chekina V.D. Digitalization of the economy: how to improve the country’s competitiveness. Kyiv, Ukraine: NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Industrial Economics, Akademperiodyka; 2021. 168 p.
38. Ayed A.B., Belhajji M.B. The Blockchain Technology: Applications and Threats. International Journal of Hyperconnectivity and the Internet of Things. 2017;1(2):1–11.
39. Casino F., Dasaklis T.K., Patsakis C. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics. 2019;36:55–81.
40. Makridakis S., Christodoulou K. Blockchain: Current challenges and future prospects/applications. Future Internet. 2019;11(12):258–274.
41. Søgaard J. S. A blockchain-enabled platform for VAT settlement. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2021;40:100502.
42. Pedersen A.B., Risius M., Beck R. A ten-step decision path to determine when to use blockchain technologies. MIS Quarterly Executive; 2019;18(2):99–115.
43. Yayman D. Blockchain in Taxation. Journal of Accounting and Finance. 2021;21(4):140–155.
44. Alm J. Tax Evasion, Technology, and Inequality. Tulane Economics Working Paper Series. January 2021. Working Paper 2101. 36 p.
45. Alm J., Beebe J., Kirsch M. S., Marian O., Soled, J. A. New technologies and the evolution of tax compliance. Tulane Economics Working Paper Series. September 2020. Working Paper; 2009. 50 p.
46. Setyowati M.S., Utami N.D., Saragih A.H., Hendrawan, A. Blockchain Technology Application for Value-Added Tax Systems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2020;6(4):156–183.
47. Allessie D., Sobolewski M., Vaccari L., Pignatelli F. (eds.). Blockchain for digital government. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2019. 88 p., JRC115049
48. Demidov O. Connected by the blockchain: review of international experience in cryptocurrency regulation. Security Index. 2015;21(2):41–60. (In Russ.).
49. Jaikaran C. Blockchain: Background and policy issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2018. 14 p.
50. Islam I., Munim K.M., Oishwee S.J., Islam A.N., Islam M.N. A critical review of concepts, benefits, and pitfalls of blockchain technology using concept map. IEEE Access. 2020;8:68333–68341.
51. Naves, J., Audia B., Busstra M., Hartog K.L., Yamamoto Y., Rikken O., van Heukelom-Verhage S. Legal Aspects of Blockchain. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. 2019;12(3-4):88–93.
52. Hyvärinen H., Risius M., Friis G. A blockchain-based approach towards overcoming financial fraud in public sector services. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2017;59(6):441–456.
53. Slemrod J. Tax Compliance and Enforcement. Journal of Economic Literature. 2019;57(4):904–954.
54. Asatryan Z., Andreas P. Responses of Firms to Tax, Administrative and Accounting Rules: Evidence from Armenia. CESifo Working Paper Series No.6754. 2017. 47 p.
55. Kowal A., Przekota G. VAT Efficiency– A Discussion on the VAT System in the European Union. Sustainability. 2021;13:4768.
56. Marian O. Blockchain Havens and the Need for Their Internationally Coordinated Regulation. North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology. 2019;20(4):529–570.
57. Atzori M. Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: is the State Still Necessary? Journal of Governance and Regulation. 2017;6(1):45–62.
58. Power D.J. “Big Brother” can watch us. Journal of Decision systems; 2016;25(supl.):578–588.
59. Vanjak Z., Mornar V., Magdalenic I. Deployment of E-invoice in Croatia. In ICSOFT 2008– Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Volume ISDM/ABF, Porto, Portugal, July 5-8, 2008, pp. 348–354.
60. Lang M., Legeune I. (eds). VAT/GST in A Global Digital Economy: Eurotax Series on European Taxation (Book 43). Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Walters Kluwer Law & Business, 2015, 19 August. 256 p.
61. OECD. Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation– Interim Report 2018: Inclusive Framework on BEPS. OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018. 215 p.
62. The Asia Internet Coalition. Indirect Taxation Challenges in the Digital Economy. AIC Tax Policy Paper; 2017. 4 p.
63. Li Jinyan. Protecting the Tax Base in the Digital Economy. UN Papers on Selected Topics in Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries. Paper No. 9. 2014. 49 p.
64. Wyonch R. Bits, Bytes, and Taxes: VAT and the Digital Economy in Canada. Commentary 487. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute; 2017. 28 p.
65. Hodzic S., Celebi H. Value-added tax and its efficiency: EU-28 and Turkey. UTMS Journal of Economics. 2017;8(2):79–90.
66. McLure Jr. C. The value-added tax on electronic Commerce in the European Union. International tax and Public Finance. 2003;10:753–762.
67. Gaber S., Gruevski I. The influence of tax culture in improving the tax compliance. Journal of Economics. 2018;3(2):80–88.
68. Alt J., Preston I., Sibieta L. The political economy of tax policy. Pp. 1204-1315. In: Adam S., Besley T., Blundell R., Bond S., Chote R., Gammie M., Johnson P., Myles G., Poterba J. (eds). Dimensions of tax design: The Mirrlees review New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2010. 1391 p.
69. Pogorletskiy A. I. tax policy in the contemporary world: peculiarities and prospects, implementation in Russia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2017;3(1):29–42.

Copyright (c) 2022 Oksana N. Harkushenko

SCOPUS logo eLibrary logoeLibrary logo  DOAJ logo ERIH PLUS logo 

© Journal of Tax Reform : ISSN 2414-9497 (online), ISSN 2412-8872 (print)