Analysis Of Economic Motives In The Individual Choice Of Educational Paths

Viktor A. Koksharov, Gavriil A. Agarkov

Abstract


The article explores economic motive forces that drive individuals to make their choices of educational paths. This research issue is relevant in equal measure to theory — the study of economic human behavior, and practice — the enhancement of human capital investment efficiency.

The authors have developed an econometric model of individual choice decisions concerning educational paths. It was implemented with the software support and bolstered with the live data on over 5.5 thousand students. To analyze the values of rational economic expectancies in the choice of educational paths, the students’ preferences were compared to the optimal, economically feasible educational paths.

The findings have shown that a choice of educational paths is chiefly made in line with the economic incentives. With respect to the analyzed sample, 66% of university applicants made their choices with regard to economic preferences. Higher expected earnings after graduation — 22% of the choices, and reduction in college tuition costs or education against the budget — 12%, are the most significant factors shaping optimal educational paths.

We believe that one outcome from the research is the prospect of a national policy issue for human capital investment with due regard for students and university entrants’ expectancies.


Keywords


system of higher education; econometric modeling; educational paths; behavioral economics; economic expectancies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gerard Debreu Market Equilibrium (1956). Proceedinqs of the National Academy of Sciences, 42, 876-878.

Kahneman D. & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47 (2), 263.

Geoffrey, M. Hodgson (2003). The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 159-175.

Keane, M. P. & Wolpin, K. I. (1997). The career decisions of young men. Journal of Political Economy. 105 (3), 473-522.

Jerrim, J. (2011). Do UK higher education students overestimate their starting salary? Fiscal Studies, 32 (4), 483-509

Jerrim, J. (2015). Do college students make better predictions of their future income than young adults in the labor force? Education Economics, 23 (2), 162-179.

Dearden, L., Fitzsimons, E., Goodman, A. & Kaplan, G. (2008). Higher education funding reforms in England: The distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs. Economic Journal, 118 (526), 100-125.

Carnoy, M., Froumin, I., Loyalka, P.K. & Tilak, J.B.G. (2014). The concept of public goods, the state, and higher education finance: a view from the BRICs. Higher Education, 1-20.

Bachan, R. (2014). Students’ expectations of debt in UK higher education. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 39, 5, 848-873.

Booij, A. S., Leuven, E. & Oosterbeek, H. (2012). The role of information in the take-up of student loans. Economics of Education Review, 31 (1), 33-44.

Beffy, M., Fougère, D. & Maurel, A. (2012). Choosing the field of study in postsecondary education: Do expected earnings matter? Review of Economics and Statistics, 94 (1), 334-347.

Eckstein, Z. & Wolpin, K.I. (1999). Why youths drop out of high school: The impact of preferences, opportunities, and abilities. Econometrica, 67 (6), 1295-1339.

Kuznetsov, A. & Kuznetsova, O. (2011). Looking for Ways to Increase Student Motivation: Internationalisation and Value Innovation. Higher Education Quarterly, 65 (4), 353-367.

Meghir, C. & Rivkin, S. (2011). Econometric Methods for Research in Education. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3, 1-87.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2015.1.014

Copyright (c) 2018 Viktor A. Koksharov, Gavriil A. Agarkov

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731