Food Security and Import Substitution: Major Strategic Objectives of Contemporary Agricultural Policy

Anatoly I. Altukhov, Veniamin V. Drokin, Alexey S. Zhuravlyov

Abstract


Rural areas and the agricultural sector are currently experiencing a radically new social and economic situation which barely fits the existing national agricultural policy as a long-term instrument for stimulating the agri-food market and government’s support of the agrarian sector and, primarily, agriculture that underlies it.

In the age of globalization of national agri-food markets, food supply security based on import substitution can be ensured in a macro-economic environment that favors the development of a competitive agricultural industry. The main factor preventing the industry from developing is the unequal inter-industrial exchange biased against the rural economy. The article proposes the author’s simple tried and tested schema for evaluating how inter-industry pricing relationships and governmental financial support (in the form of subsidies) to agricultural organizations affect their margins. The evaluation leads to the following conclusions:

– Given its real contribution to the national economy, the agro-industry is self-sufficient for its own development, i.e. the state objectively has the potential to increase its expenses on the elimination of the negative consequences from an unequal inter-industry exchange;

– Federal expenditures on such state support must secure a margin for agricultural goods producers that enables stimuli for workers’ efficiency and an affordable credit system for the technical and technological upgrade of the facilities required for the production of competitive goods;

– The issues of competitive growth of agricultural products require solutions primarily on a federal scale.

An essential factor of competitive growth of individual types of national food and agricultural raw materials should involve science proven EEU agricultural treaties. The article discusses the major priorities in developing a common agricultural policy in the new integration institution.


Keywords


agricultural policy; price disparities; Eurasian Economic Union; import substitution; competitiveness and competitive advantages; food supply security and independence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gosudarstvennaya programma razvitiya selskogo khozyaystva i regulirovaniya rynkov selskokhozyaystvennoy produktsii, syrya i prodovolstviya na 2013-2020 gody [National program for the development of agriculture and regulation of markets of agricultural products, raw materials, and food for 2013–2020]. Moscow: FGBNU Rosinformagrotekh Publ., 204.

Gumerov, R. (2010). Obespechenie prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti strany. Udalsya li doktrinalnyy dokument? [Ensuring national food supply security. Did the doctrinal document work?]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian economic journal], 2, 11-22.

Ovchinnikov, O. G. (2015). Opyt SShA i tekushchie zadachi razvitiya agrarnogo sektora Rossii [US experience and current problems of development of the Russian agrarian sector]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2, 48-50.

Buzdalov, I. (2010). Rossiyskoye krestyanstvo pod pressom «perekachki» [The Russian peasantry under a pump-over pressure] Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and economics], 2, 73-86.

Bespakhotnyy, G. V. (2015). Zadachi gosudarstvennogo planirovaniya APK i metody ikh resheniya [National agricultural planning issues and solutions]. Ekonomika selskogo khozyaystva Rossii [Russian agricultural economy], 5, 2-7.

Serkov, A. F. (2014). Agrarnaya politika: vyzovy i perspektiva [Agricultural policy: challenges and perspective]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [The economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 12, 2-6.

Kizhlay, G. M. & Rogoleva, N. S. (2014). Trudovyye resursy i ekonomicheskaya effektivnost ikh ispolzovaniya v selskom khozyaystve [Efficient use of labor resources in agriculture]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala [Ural agrarian messenger], 7, 88-93.

Golubev, A. V. (2015). Razvitie APK na osnove otechestvennykh innovatsiy kak uslovie importozameshcheniya [Development of the agroindustrial complex based on national innovation as a prerequisite for import substitution]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [The economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2, 42-47.

Aganbegyan, A. G. & Porfiryev, B. N. (2015). Zameshchenie importa prodovolstviya i razvitie «zelyonoy» agroekonomiki kak strategicheskie otvety na antirossiyskie sektoralnye sanktsii [Substitution of food import and development of green agriculture as a strategic response to anti-russian sectoral sanctions]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [The economy of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2, 16-27.

Porter, M. (2006). Konkurentsiya [The competition]. Moscow: Williams Publ., 608.

Robinson, J. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya nesovershennoy konkurentsii [Imperfect competition theory]. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ., 390.

Skakun, A. S. (2013). Prioritetnyye napravleniya po povysheniyu effektivnosti I konkurentosposobnosti agropromyshlennogo kompleksa [Priority guidelines to improve efficiency and competitiveness of agroindustrial complex]. Vesti NAN Belarusi [Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus], 1, 23–31.

Uilmson, O. I. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: firmy, rynki, otnoshencheskaya kontraktatsiya [Economic institutes of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting]. St.Petersburg: Lenizdat Publ., 702.

Kholden, R. K. (2001). Strategiya i taktika tsenoobrazovaniya [Strategy and tactics of pricing]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 404.

Gelvanovskiy, M. (2005). Chto takoye konkurentosposobnost? [What is competitiveness?]. Voprosy ekonomiki perekhodnogo perioda [Transition Economy Issues], 7, 3-25.

Gimadi, I. E., Drokin, V. V. & Zhuravlev, A. S. (2006). Razmeshchenie i spetsializatsiya selskokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva v industrialnom regione. Ispolzovanie konkurentnykh preimushchestv, gosudarstvennoye regulirovanie [Allocation and specialization of agricultural production in an industrial region: use of competitive advantages, national regulation]. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS Publ., 209.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2015.3.012

Copyright (c) 2018 Anatoly I. Altukhov, Veniamin V. Drokin, Alexey S. Zhuravlyov