Assessment of hard-to-recover oil reserves production potential in Tomsk region

Irina V. Sharf, Larisa S. Grinkevich

Abstract


The development of the licensed areas, profound geological exploration, enhanced oil recovery due to innovative technologies introduction and revitalization of oil production from unconventional horizons could significantly increase the oil production in the Tomsk region. This article deals with the issue of oil producing companies’ affairs of the Tomsk region for the past 10 years and proves the oil production potential growth through the development of both conventional and hard-to-recover unconventional oil reserves, concentrated in the Bazhenov and Tyumen Formations, as well as in the Lower Jurassic sediments. The Russian Federation is far behind from the economically developed countries, especially from the United States, in the exploitation of hard-to-recover unconventional hydrocarbon resources. The «shale revolution» was determined by a complex of financial and tax incentives introduced for oil and gas companies. However, this was mainly beneficial for medium and small sized companies. Therefore, both the business entities and regional authorities should increase the investments spending, as well as introduce the additional tax incentives considering the quality and type of potentially available raw hydrocarbons produced in the region, in contrast to the declared benefits in the territory of Eastern Siberia. The introduction of tax incentives justified by the authors, and the implementation of public-private partnership mechanism will ensure the profitability of marginal and hard-to-recover deposits development of the Tomsk region in the long run, which in its turn, should ensure the stability of the economic development of the reviewed subject of the Russian Federation.

Keywords


oil production; hard-to-recover reserves; tax incentive; Bazhenov Formation; Mineral Production Tax

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sharf, I. V. (2014). Analiz struktury finansirovaniya geologorazvedochnykh rabot v regionakh Vostochnoy Sibiri [The analysis of financing structure of prospecting works in the regions of Eastern Siberia]. Neftegazovoye delo [Oil and gas business], 1, 196–202.

Ilina, G. F. & Ilin, N. N. (2014). Tekushchaya situatsiya v sfere geologorazvedochnykh rabot na territorii Tomskoy oblasti [The current situation in the sphere of prospecting works in the territory of the Tomsk region]. Molodoy uchenyy [Young scientist], 13, 104 –107.

Bajus, M. (2014). Shale gas and tight oil, unconventional fossil fuels. Petroleum & Coal, 56(3), 206–221.

Bryden, K., Federspie, M., Habib, E. T. & Schiller, R. (2014). Processing Tight Oils in FCC: Issues, Opportunities and Flexible Catalytic Solutions. Grace Catalysts Technologies Catalagram, 114, 3–23.

Levinbuk, M. I. & Kotov, V. N. (2013). Izmenenie struktury potrebleniya osnovnykh energonositeley v SShA — odin iz vyzovov energeticheskoy bezopasnosti Rossii [Change of consumption structure of the main energy carriers in the USA — a challenge for the energy security of Russia]. Mir nefteproduktov [World of oil products], 9, 3–14.

Baykov, N. M. & Baykova, E. N. (2013). Perspektivy razrabotki mestorozhdeniy slantsevoy nefti [Prospects of the development of shale oil deposits]. Neftyanoye khozyaystvo [Oil economy], 5, 120–123.

Dale, S. (2015, October). New Economics of Oil. Society of Business Economists Annual Conference. London, 19. Retrieved from: http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/speeches/2015/new-economics-of-oil-spencer-dale.pdf (date of access: 11.01.16).

Hughes, J. D. (2014). Drilling deeper a reality check on U.S. Government forecasts for a lasting tight oil & shale gas boom part 2: Tight oil. Post carbon institute, 308, Retrieved from: http://www.postcarbon.org/publications/drillingdeeper/ (date of access: 11.01.2016).

Balandina, A. S. (2013). Reformirovanie sistemy nalogovykh lgot neftegazovogo sektora Rossii [Reforming of the tax privileges system for the oil and gas sector of Russia]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Tomsk State University], 4, 110–115.

Panskov, V. G. (2009). O nalogovom stimulirovanii investitsionnoy deyatelnosti [On tax incentives of investment activity]. Finansy [Finances], 2, 38–42.

Fesenko, V. (2014). Neftegazovyy kompleks — oborudovanie, tekhnologii i videnie razvitiya [Oil and gas complex — the equipment, technologies and ways for development]. TEK. Strategiya razvitiya. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy zhurnal [Fuel-and-energy company. Development strategy. Information and analytical journal], 3, 22–25.

Lemons, K. (2014). The Shale Revolution and OPEC: Potential Economic Implications of Shale Oil for OPEC and Member Countries. The Larrie and Bobbi Weil Undergraduate Research Award Documents. Paper 5, 51. Retrieved from: http://digitalrepository.smu.edu/weil_ura/5 (date of access: 11.01.16).

Wang, Z. & Krupnick, A. (2013). A Retrospective Review of Shale Gas Development in the United States: What Led to the Boom? Resources for the Future. Discussion paper, 39. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2286239 (date of access: 11.01.16).

Grinkevich, L. S. & Sharf, I. V. (2009, October). Effektivnaya sistema nalogooblozheniya v nedropolzovanii: kriterii formirovaniya i pokazateli otsenki [Effective system of the taxation in subsurface management: criteria of development and performance indicators]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Tomsk State University], 327, 135–139.

Vorobev, F. (2014). Bolshoye budushchee dlya maloy nefti? [Is there a big future for small oil?]. Neft Rossii [Oil of Russia], 1–2, 20–24.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2016.2.1.011

Copyright (c) 2018 Irina V. Sharf, Larisa S. Grinkevich

© R-Economy, ISSN 2412-0731