Government support for monotowns in the Republic of Kazakhstan

Larisa L. Bozhko

Abstract


The objectives of the study are to identify the role of single-industry towns (also known as “monotowns”) in the economic development of the Republic of Kazakhstan, to determine the specific features of monotowns and to assess the effectiveness of government program documents aimed at supporting these entities.

A number of research methods were used, including logical, systematic, structural-functional, comparative analysis, statistical and index methods, economic forecasting and sociological surveys. Using these methods in combination allowed the researcher to consider the phenomena and processes, the dynamics and development, thus providing evidence as to the reliability of the conclusions obtained.

As a result of this study, distinctive features of the socio-economic development of monotowns in the Republic of Kazakhstan were revealed. In addition, an evaluation was made of the main program documents aimed at supporting the development of monotowns; and the factors affecting their further development were identified. Proposals have been made in this study with regard to best ways in which to improve the monotown management systems both in terms of improving the program documents and in developing new evaluation tools.

The principal novel feature of this study is the identification of the main trends in the development of monotowns in the Republic of Kazakhstan. These trends reveal that, although monotowns do play an important role in the economy of the country, they also tend to develop in extremely uneven and inconsistent ways and are characterized by having weak economic diversification and a strong dependence on the town-forming enterprises, with these enterprises mainly being mining companies. The recommendations in this study are based on the need to improve both the administrative and economic methods used for the state regulation of monotowns. During this study, the feasibility of making adjustments in the current development programs aimed at supporting monotowns and the consistency of development programs were considered.


Keywords


monotown; governmental program; development specifics; support tools; town-forming enterprises; development strategy; regional development program; economic and social development; development tools; indicators

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nurlanova, N. K. (Ed.). (2014). Monogoroda Kazahstana: metodicheskie osnovy otsenki sostoyaniya i napravleniya razvitiya [Monotowns of Kazakhstan: methodological basics to assess the state and direction of development]. Almaty: Institut ekonomiki KN MON RK [Institute of Economics Committee of science, Ministry of education and science of the RK], 254.

Dmitriev, A. V. & Sleptsov, N. S. (2004). Konflikty migratsii [Migration conflicts]. Moscow: Alfa, 224.

Mezhevich, M. N. (1978). Territorial’naya obshchnost’ lyudej i sotsial’noe razvitie v usloviyah sotsializma [Territorial unity of people and social development in socialism’s conditions]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 3, 29–38.

Akhiezer, A. S. (1989). Kachestvo gorodskoj sredy kak faktor intensifikatsii progressa [Urban environmental quality as a factor of progress intensifying]. In G.M. Lappo & T.V. Bochkarev (Eds.), Problemy kachestva gorodskoj sredy [Issues of urban environmental quality]. Moscow: Nauka.

Dridze, T. M. (1996). Sotsial’no-diagnosticheskoe issledovanie goroda [Socio-diagnostic study of city]. Vestnik Rossijskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda [Bulletin of Russian humanities research foundation], 1, 95–103.

Tatarkin, A. I. et al. (Eds.). (2011). Ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo: teoriya i realii [Economic space: theory and realities]. Moscow: Economika, 374.

Animitsa, E. G., Bochko, V. S. & Peshina, E. V. (2010). Kontseptual’nye podhody k razrabotke strategii razvitiya monoprofil’nogo goroda [Conceptual approaches to strategic development of a monoprofile town]. Yekaterinburg: Ural state economic university, 81.

Dinius, O. J. (2011). Company Towns in the Americas. Landscape, Power, and Working-Class. University of Georgia Press, 241.

Hollander, J. & Németh, J. (2011). The bounds of smart decline: a foundational theory for planning shrinking cities. Housing and Policy Debate, 21(3), 349–367.

Schilling, J. & Logan, J. (2008). Greening the rust belt: A green infrastructure model for right sizing America’s shrinking cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), 451–466.

Martinez-Fernandez, C., Pallagst, K., & Wiechmann, T. (2013). Shrinking Cities: International Perspectives and Policy Implications. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis., 334.

Xui, L. (1999). Sravnitel’noe issledovanie modelej innovatsionnogo razvitiya staropromyshlennyh regionov KNR i stran byvshego SSSR [Comparative research of innovative development models of the old industrial PRC and the former USSR countries]. In North-East Asia academic forum (Symposium special issue). Paper presented at North-Eastern Asian academic forum, Harbin university of commerce, Harbin (pp. 50–57). Harbin: Harbin university of commerce

Alpysbaeva, S. N., Kuchukova, N. K., Pritvorova, T. P., Mukashev, T. A. et al. (2003). Ustojchivoe sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie regiona: metodologiya i praktika [Sustainable regional socio-economic development: methodology and practice]. Astana: Parasat-Elemi, 408

Nurlanova, N. K. & Brimbetova, N. Zh. (Eds.). (2014). Regional’naya politika Kazahstana: teoriya i praktika [Regional policy of Kazakhstan: theory and practice]. Almaty: Institut ekonomiki KN MON RK [Institute of Economics Committee of science, Ministry of education and science of the RK], 288.

R-Economy Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2017

Kogan, L. B. (2010). Urbanologiya i gorodskaya politika: ot osoznaniya k znaniyu [Urbanology and urban policy: from perception to knowledge]. Moscow, 225

Limonov, L. E. (2004). Krupnyj gorod: regulirovanie territorial’nogo razvitiya i investitsionnye strategii [Large city: regulating territorial development and investment strategies]. SPb.: Nauka, 270.

Resin, V. I. & Popkov, Yu. S. (2000). Razvitie bol’shih gorodov v usloviyah perekhodnoj ekonomiki (sistemnyj podhod) [Development of big cities in transition economy (system approach)]. M.: Editorial URSS, 328.

Saiko, E. V. (1995). Gorod kak osobyj organizm i faktor sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiya [City as a special organism and a factor of socio-cultural development]. In: E. V. Saiko (Ed.), City as a socio-cultural phenomenon of historical process [Gorod kak sociokul’turnoe yavlenie istoricheskogo processa] (pp. 9–21). Moscow: Nauka.

Davankov, A. Yu. (2009). Nauchno-metodicheskie osnovy obespecheniya samodostatochnosti malyh gorodov [Methodological fundamentals to keep self-dependency of small towns]. Preprint. Ekaterinburg: Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 77

Neshchadin, A. A. & Gorin, N. I. (2001). Fenomen goroda: sotsial’no-ekonomicheskij analiz [City phenomenon: socio-economic analysis]. Moscow: Izograf, 239

Alekseyev, Yu. P., Gaponenko, A. G. & Alisov, A. N. (1995). Munitsipal’nyj i regional’nyj menedzhment [Municipal and regional management]. Moscow, 254

Leksin, V. N. & Shvetsov, A. N. (2000). Gosudarstvo i regiony: Teoriya i praktika gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya territorial’nogo razvitiya [State and regions: Theory and practice of state regulation of territorial development]. Moscow: URSS, 368.

Turgel, I. D., Bozhko, L. L. & Xui, L. (2016). Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka razvitiya monogorodov Rossii i Kazahstana [State support of monotowns’ development in Russia and Kazakhstan]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta [Bulletin of Financial university], 2 (92), 22–33.

Bozhko, L. L. & Leskova, L. G. (2015). Sovershenstvovanie metodologicheskih podhodov k upravleniyu razvitiem monogorodov v Respublike Kazahstan [Improvement of methodological approaches to monotowns’ development management in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Munitsipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie [Municipality: economics and management], 3, 16–26.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2017.3.1.001

Copyright (c) 2018 Larisa L. Bozhko