Evaluation of economic security in the Ural region in the context of development of small and medium-sized enterprises

N. Yu. Vlasova, O. O. Kalganova


Enhancing economic security of regions is crucial for the development of the whole country, which is what makes research in this sphere particularly important. This study aims to analyze and compare the economic security data on the regions constituting the Ural Federal District (Russia). In contrast with current studies in the field, we are conducting detailed analysis of the factors that affect the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and business climate in the regions. The conceptual framework of this research relies on entrepreneurship theories and theoretical approaches to analysis and evaluation of regional economic security. We develop methodology based on sets of quantitative and qualitative indicators and apply analytical, comparative and statistical methods as well as the method of expert evaluation. The data are provided by the regional statistic services and business support foundations. We also analyze regional support programs for small and medium-sized businesses. We found that all regions of the Ural Federal District are characterized by the medium (acceptable) level of economic security and moderate risk. In the economic security ranking, Tyumen region is at the top while the second place is occupied by Sverdlovsk region; Chelyabinsk and Kurgan regions are at the bottom.


region; regional economic security; small and middle-sized enterprises; entrepreneurship; business support programs; Ural Federal District

Full Text:



Tatarkin, A. I., & Kuklin A. A. (2012). Changing the Paradigm of Region’s Economic Security Research. Ekonomika regiona, 2, 25–39.

Glaziev, S. Y. (2015). On Urgent Measures to Enhance Economic Security and Advanced Economic Development of Russia. Rossiysky ekonomichesky zhurnal, 5, 3–62.

Korableva, A. A. (2016). Interregional Comparisons in the Context of Economic Security. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics, 10, 18–27.

Mingaleva, J. A., & Gershanok, G. A. (2012). Sustainable Development in the Region: Innovation, Competitiveness and Economic Security. Ekonomika regiona, 3, 68–77.

Podprugin, A. V., & Golyashina, E. A. (2015). State Support for Small Businesses as a Way to Enhance Regional Economic Security. Prioritetnye nauchnye napravlenia: ot teorii k praktike, 18, 160–164.

Sarkisyan, A. D. (2017). Economic Security of Small Business as an Indicator of Stability of the Regional and National Economic System. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatelstvo; pravo i upravlenie, 10, 96–99.

Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2017). Small Business and Entrepreneurship: Th eir Role in Economic and Social Development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(1–2), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1255438

Acs, Z., Åstebro, T., Audretsch, D., & Robinson, D. T. (2016). Public Policy to Promote Entrepreneurship: a Call to Arms. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 35–51. doi: 10.1007/s11187-016- 9712-2

Arshed, N., Mason, C., & Carter, S. (2016). Exploring the Disconnect in Policy Implementation: A Case of Enterprise Policy in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(8), 1582–1611.

Autio, E., & Rannikko, H. (2016). Retaining Winners: Can Policy Boost High-Growth Entrepreneurship? Research Policy, 45(1), 42–55. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.002

Bondonio, D., Geenbaum, R.T. (2014). Revitalizing Regional Economies through Enterprise Support Policies: an Impact Evaluation of Multiple Instruments. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 79–103. doi: 10.1177/0969776411432986

Kuril, J. (2018). Protection of the State and Society: Public Administration and Public (State) Service. Journal of Security and Sustainability, 7(3), 409–416. doi: 10.9770/jssi.2018.7.3(3)

Korchagina, I. V. (2016). Characteristics of Regional Economic Policy to Develop Clusters of Small-Size Enterprises. Strategia ustoychivogo razvitia regionov Rossii, 35, 113–117.

Fotopoulos, G., & Storey, D. J. (2018). Public Policies to Enhance Regional Entrepreneurship: Another Programme Failing to Deliver? Small Business Economics, doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0021-9

Huggins, R., Prokop, D., & Th ompson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurship and the Determinants of Firm Survival within Regions: Human Capital, Growth Motivation and Locational Conditions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(3–4), 357–389. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1271830

Aidis, R. (2005). Institutional Barriers to Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprise Operations in Transition Countries. Small Business Economics, 25(4), 305–317. doi: 10.1007/s11187-003-6463-7

Bateman, M. (2000). Neo-Liberalism, SME Development and the Role of Business Support Centers in the Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 275–298. doi: 10.1023/A:1008170805013

Nguyen, B., Mickiewitcz, T., & Du, J. (2018). Local Governance and Business Performance in Vietnam: the Transaction Costs’ Perspective. Regional Studies, 52(4), 542–557.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2018.4.3.017

Copyright (c) 2018 N. Yu. Vlasova, O. O. Kalganova

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731