Spatial-territorial factors of economic growth in the Russian Federation

Rustem R. Akhunov, Azat V. Yangirov

Abstract


Relevance. In contemporary economic research, the study of the diversity of factors of national economic growth is gaining more and more significance, particularly with regard to the so-called 'spatial-territorial factors'. In contrast to the existing concepts of regional and spatial economy, the approach described in this paper is based on the hypothesis that it is possible to accelerate national economic growth. It can be done by stimulating extended economic reproduction on the subnational level, that is, on the level of relatively independent and self-contained spatial and administrative units such as regions of the Russian Federation, municipalities, agglomerations, etc.

Research objective. The study aims to propose a decomposition of the economic growth rates in Russia by territorial units and to describe the spatial-territorial factors of national economic growth.

Data and methods. To characterize the spatial-territorial factors, we used indices of the physical volume of gross regional product (GRP) and gross value added (GVA) in types of economic activities in Russian regions in percentage to the previous year for the period of 2013-2018. The types of economic activities were specified according to the Russian Classifier of Economic Activities of 2007 (OKVED) (Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community - NACE Rev. 1.1 (2013-2016)) and OKVED-2 (NACE Rev.2 (2017-2018)).

Results. We estimated the contributions of Russian regions to national economic growth by analyzing the data on the key types of economic activities in a 6-year period (2013-2018). We also identified the regions which accounted for the largest losses in economic growth, on the one hand, and those which, on the other hand, acted as drivers of the country's economic development.

Conclusion. There is a small number of regions lagging in terms of GRP and their influence on the national rates of economic growth is also insignificant. The general rates of GRP decline in a region are determined, first and foremost, by the sluggish growth in those types of economic activities that have the largest share in GRP. The number and share of the regions which demonstrate extended economic reproduction, that is, deliver at least 2% growth a year, are also quite small. These regions make up slightly more than 19% of the country's GRP.

 The largest group of regions comprises those regions that do not go beyond the simple reproduction (their growth rates are less than 2% a year), while their share in the country's GRP exceeds 74%.

The so-called ‘heavyweights’ - regions accounting for the largest share in the country's total GRP - have the strongest effect on the national rates of economic growth, hindering it. It is the economic structure of these regions that has the biggest influence on the country's performance in such types of economic activities as wholesale and retail trade and maintenance and repair of motor vehicles. Sadly, it is in these sectors that the 'heavyweights' demonstrate the largest losses in GVA. As a result, these sectors suffer the most, which is bound to be reflected in the country's overall economic growth.


Keywords


economic growth, spatial-territorial factors, regions, economic reproduction, gross regional product, types of economic activities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aydalot, P. (1980) Dynamique spatiale et développement inégal. Paris: Ed. ECONOMICA, 354.

Bunge, W. (1962). Theoretical geography. Lund: Royal University of Lund, Dept. of Geography; Gleerup, 289.

Chabot, G. (1969). Geographie regionale de la France. Paris, Masson et Cie, 435.

Christaller, W. (1968). Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland: Eine ökonomisch-geographische Unter-suchung über die Gesetzmässigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 331.

Hagerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Lund: Gleerup, 485.

Hettner, A. (1927). Die Geographie ihre Geschichte, ihr Wesen und ihre Methoden. Breslau: F. Hirt, 463.

Lösch, A. (1940). Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft: eine Untersuchung über Standort, Wirtschaftsgebiete und internationalem Handel. Jena: Fischer, 455.

Ritter, C. (1841). Die Erdkunde Im Verhaltniss Zur Natur Und Zur Geschichte Des Menschen: Oder Allgemeine Vergleichende Geographie, ALS Sichere Grundlage Des Studiums Und Unterrichts in Physikalischen Und Historischen Wissenschaften. Berlin: G. Reimer, 876.

Thünen, J. (1826). Der isolirte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirthschaft und Nationalökonomie, oder Untersuchungen über den Einfluß, den die Getreidepreise, der Reichthum des Bodens und die Abga-ben auf den Ackerbau ausüben. Hamburg : bei Friedrich Perthes, 290.

Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international economic policy. New York : Twentieth Century Fund, 330.

Ullman, E. (1957). American commodity flow: a geographical interpretation of rail and water traffic based on principles of spatial interchange. Seattle : University of Washington Press, 215.

Weber, A. (1909). Über den Standort der Industrie. Teil 1. Reine Theorie des Standorts. Toronto: Tü-bingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 246.

Alexandrov, I.G. (1928). Industrial Zoning and its Methodology. Part I. Planovoye khozyastvo, 4, 46‑65.

Gross Regional Product. (08.01.2021). Official site of the Federal State Statistics Service. [Electronic resource]. Source: https://rosstat.gov.ru/accounts#

Granberg, A.G. (1973). Optimization of the Territorial Proportions of National Economy. Moscow: Ekonomika, 248.

Knipovich, B.N. (1925). Agricultural Zoning. Moscow: Novaya derevnya, 192.

Kolosovsky, N.N. (1947). Industrial-Territorial Complex in Soviet Economic Geography. Voprosy geografii, 6, 133-168.

Minakir, P.A. (1983). Economic Development of Regions: Strategic Approach/ Ed.A.G. Zeldner, N.I. Tsvetkov; Institute of Economic Studies, Far Eastern Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Moscow: Nauka, 224.

Minakir, P.A., Demyanenko, A.N. (2010). Spatial Economics: Evolution of Approaches and Method-ology. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii, 3, 7-26.

Mikheeva, N.N. (2016). Preconditions for the Formation of a New Model of Economic Growth: Spa-tial Aspect. Research papers: Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 14, 586-605.

Nekrasov, N.N. (1973). Economy of the USSR as an Integral Economic Complex. Moscow: Znanie, 63.

Chelintsev, A.N. (1928). Methodology of Agricultural Micro-Zoning. Moscow: Novaya derevnya, 40.

Shniper, R.I. (1979). Regional Pre-Plan Studies: (Economic Aspect)/ Ed. B.P.Orlov. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Siberian Branch, 367.

Yusupov, K.N. (1980). Autonomous Republic in the System of Social Reproduction. Moscow: Nauka, 189.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2021.7.1.004

Copyright (c) 2021 Rustem R. Akhunov, Azat V. Yangirov