Assessment of the Leontiev productive matrix of the economic development model for Tyumen region (Russia)

Vladimir R. Tsibulsky, Larisa V. Vazhenina, Ilya G. Solovyov, Denis A. Govorkov, Viktor P. Novikov

Abstract


Relevance. Monitoring has always been an important part of the management of regional development. Recently, this task has been gaining currency due to the development of modern information technologies of data collection and processing, citizen-government interaction and digital modelling. The task of goal evaluation, that is, comparison of the actual results with the intended ones in different spheres, among other things, requires us to build and adjust the macro-economic model of regional development and in particular to update the input-output matrix based on the region’s statistical data. 

Research objective. The study aims to build a table of input-output balance for the south of Tyumen region (Russia) based on the statistical data of standardized economic indicators.

Method and data. Two options for estimating the input-output matrix for Tyumen region are described. In the first option, a well-known method of adjustment of the reference input-output matrix for the priority economic sectors of Tyumen region is supplemented by the regularization of the resulting parameters according to the least squares method for the selected period. The second option is based on the aggregation of industries by subsystems based on the cost structure table of the same industries, but for the entire country, followed by the identification of the already aggregated matrix, without adjusting the result to the standard.

Results. In the first option, we obtained a table of input-output balance for 2018. The table quite accurately reproduces the invoice structure of costs and consumption. The aggregated input-output matrix, taking regularization into account, reproduces the actual costs of the region for 2016-2018 with good approximation. In the second option, the distribution of the resulting direct costs coefficients over the years does not exceed 10%.

Conclusions. The resulting estimates of the Leontiev input-output matrices meet the requirements of productivity and balance and can be used in benchmark problems for the analysis and forecasting of the economic development of Tyumen region. A variation of the functional scheme for assessing and analyzing the discrepancies between the declared and actual trajectories of the indicators based on the Leontiev matrix is proposed.


Keywords


input-output model, direct cost matrix, regional development trajectory, national accounts statistics, input-output tables

Full Text:

PDF

References


Auloge, J. (1979). Identification of an Input-Output Leontief Model (New trends in dynamic system theory and economics. Academic Press, New-York, San Francisco, London: A Subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Javanovich Publishers, 442.

Bayzakov, S., Yeshimova, D.A., & Oinarov, A.R. (2016). On models of balanced economic growth. Turan University Bulletin = Vestnik universiteta Turan, 4 (72), 16–22. (In Russ.)

Beklaryan, L.A., & Pshennikov, A.S. (2001). Concerning some aspects of methodology for analysis of regional problems. Audit and Financial Analysis= Audit i finansovyj analiz, 4, 81–96. (In Russ.)

Borisov, G.O., & Dondokov, Z.BD. (2019). Energy Indusnry of the Ripublic of Buryatia current state and prerequisites for future development. International Conference “Regional Energy Policy of Asian Russia”, vol. 77, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197703005

Bossel, H. (2001). Sustainable Development Indicators. Theory, methodology, practical use: report submitted to the Balaton Group. Translation from English. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Tyumen: Publishing House of Inta, Problems of Development of the North SB RAS, 121 p. (In Russ.)

Dondokov, Z.BD., Potapov, L.V., & Kislov, E.V. (2019). Main Directions and Problems of Development or the Minerals and Raw Materials Sector in the Republic of Buryatia. Geography and Natural Resources, 1(40), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372819010116

Dyrheev, K.P. (2017). Extended interindustry model of the region based on the Miyazawa methodology. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Economics and Management = Ekonomika i menedzhment, 3, 65–71. http://journals.bsu.ru/doi/10.18101/2304-4446-2017-3-65-71 (In Russ.)

Govorkov, D.A., Novikov, V.P., Solovyov, I.G., & Tsibulsky, V.R. (2021). Computational scheme for estimating the Leontiev input-output matrix according to data of the input-output tables for the south of the Tyumen region. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice = Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika, 12(19), 2360–2383. https://doi.org/10.24891/re.19.12.2360 (In Russ.)

Jensen, R.C., Dewhurst, J.H., West, G.R., & Hewings, G.J.D (1991). On the concept of fundamental economic structure. Regional input-output modeling: new developments and interpretations, 228–249.

Kuladzhi, T.V. (2016). Matrix tools for microforecasting in an innovation cluster. Scientific and technical newsletters of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. economic sciences = Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 4(246), 264–279. https://doi.org/10.5862/JE.246.23 (In Russ.)

Leontiev, V.V. (1997). Inter-industry economy. Translation from English. M.: OAO Publishing House Economics, 479 p. (In Russ.)

Martynov, G.V., & Malkov, U.Kh. (2011). Development of an interindustry model of reproduction and investment dynamics. Economics and Mathematical Methods = Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 2(47), 24–42. (In Russ.)

Masakova, I.D. (2019). The Russian Practice of Compiling Input-Output Tables: Problems and Prospects of Development. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 30, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700719020126

Mashunin, Yu.K., & Mashunin, I.A. (2016). Organization of management, modeling and forecasting of the development of the regional economy. Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal = Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal, 1(45), 29–58. (In Russ.)

Mikheeva, N.N. (2006). Evaluating the Russian Far East’s Resource Sector Based on “Input-Output” Tables. Spatial Economics, 1, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.14530/SE.2006.1.072-086

Mikheeva, N.N. (2011). Input-output tables: new opportunities for economic analysis. Questions of Economics = Voprosy ekonomiki, 7, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-7-140-148 (In Russ.)

Miller, R., & Blair, B. (2009) Input-Output Analysis. foundations and extensions. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 784.

Percoco, M. (2013). Strategies of regional development in European regions: Are they efficient? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6, 303–318.

Reshetnikov, M.G. (2008) Effectiveness of public administration as a factor ща increase of competitive power of the region. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice = Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika, 18(75), 4–24. (In Russ.)

Romanov, B.A. (2018). Using the input-output model for planning the production program of a group of interacting enterprises. Economic challenges of organization of production. Production organizer = Ekonomicheskie problemy organizacii proizvodstva. Organizator proizvodstva, 1(26), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.25065/1810-4894-2018-26-1-73-83 (In Russ.)

Sayapova, A.R. (2008). Regional and Russian input-output tables. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 19, 574–581. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700708060026

Sayapova, A.R. (2011). Regional differentiation of coefficients of direct expenditures in input-output symmetric tables. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 22, 488. https://doi.org/10.1134/S107570071105008X

Serebryakov, G.R., Uzyakov, M.N., & Yantovsky, A.A. (2002). Interindustry model of the economy of the Ivanovo region. Challenges of Forecasting = Problemy prognozirovaniya, 5, 64–74. (In Russ.)

Shirov, A.A. (2018). Use of Input–Output Approach for Supporting Decisions in the Field of Economic Policy. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 29, 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1134/S107570071806014X

Shirov, A.A., Sayapova, A.R., & Yantovskii, A.A. (2015). Integrated input-output balance as an element of analysis and forecasting in the post-soviet space. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 26, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700715010128

Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. (2001). Expanded Miyazawa Framework: Labor and Capital Income, Savings, Consumption, and Investment Links. REAL 00-T-14.1-13.

Tatarkin, D.A., Sidorova, E.N., Trynov, A.V. et al. (2017). Development of an investment passport of the region based on the multipliers of the financial flow matrix. Bulletin of UrFU. Economics and Management Series = Vestnik UrFU. Seriya ekonomika i upravlenie, 6(16), 909–927. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2017.16.6.043 (In Russ.)

Tsibulsky, V.R., Menova, N.F., & Tarkhova, N.A. et al. (2004). Tyumen: indicators of sustainable development. Tyumen: Publishing House of IPOS SB RAS, 308 p. (In Russ.)

Tsybatov, V.A. (2015). Models and methods of strategizing the regional development. Bulletin of the Samara State University of Economics, 3(125), 49–66.

Wagner, J., & Deller, S. (1993). A Measure of Economic Diversity: An Input-Output Approach, 18. (In Russ.)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2022.8.2.011

Copyright (c) 2022 Vladimir R. Tsibulsky, Larisa V. Vazhenina, Ilya G. Solovyov, Denis A. Govorkov, Viktor P. Novikov

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 23.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731