Intermittent Development of Central Place Systems: The Dynamics of Unification and Breakup

Ruslan V. Dmitriev, Stanislav A. Gorokhov, Maksim M. Agafoshin

Abstract


Relevance. The development of central place theory has been hindered by its static nature, as it fails to capture transitions between equilibrium states in central place systems. This long-standing problem remains unsolved since the theory's inception 90 years ago. This article presents a solution by examining the cases of system unification and system breakup, where previously independent systems merge or split.

Research objective: The study aims to identify the conditions under which central place systems resume continual development following revolutionary transformations in their structure.

Data and methods: The research analyzes census data from India (1947-2011) and Yemen (1973-2004) using equations based on the axioms of central place theory. The study also considers isostatic equilibrium as the foundation of central place system structures.

Results: The effect of intermittence on the steady evolution of a central place system diminishes rapidly after the unification of two independent systems. In contrast, the adaptation of elements from a previously unified system to new conditions, including reinstating the former hierarchy and spatial structure, takes significantly longer after a system breakup. The study introduces a novel perspective, highlighting that the unification of central place systems tends to lead to progress, whereas the breakup of a unified system results in degradation.

Conclusions: The true benefit to a central place system lies not solely in achieving isostatic equilibrium but in maintaining a secure and optimal structure. While these concepts share similarities, they may appear more distinct when examining the central place system as a whole. Equilibrium represents an optimal state for individual hierarchy levels rather than the entire system.


Keywords


central place theory, spatial structure, hierarchical structure, evolution, revolutionary change

Full Text:

PDF

References


Banens, M. (1999). Vietnam: A reconstitution of its 20th century population history. Retrieved from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00369251/document

Beckmann, M. J. (1958). City hierarchies and the distribution of city size. Economic development and cultural change, 6 (3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/449769

Christaller, W. (1933). Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, 331 [Christaller, W. (1966). Central Places in Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 230].

Dmitriev, R. V. (2021a). Central place systems: formation of the population and spatial structures. Geographical Bulletin, 4, 6–17. https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2021-4-6-17 (In Russ.)

Dmitriev, R. V. (2021b). The evolution of settlement systems in classic central place theory. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 2, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621020047 (In Russ.)

Dmitriev, R. V., & Gorokhov, S. A. (2022). Central place systems: early stages of the continual development. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, 18 (2), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.2.038-055 (In Russ.)

Dutch, R. A. (1942). Census of India. Vol. IV: Bengal tables. Simla: Government of India Press, 18.

Fujita, M., Krugman, P. & Mori T. (1999). On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems. European Economic Review, 43 (2), 209–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00066-X

Gorokhov, S. A. (2011). India. Religion, demography and the policy. Asia and Africa today, 7, 24–32. (In Russ.)

Hudiaev, I. A. (2008). Evolution of systems of moving: from the regularity to singularity. Regional'nye issledovanija, 4, 15–25. (In Russ.)

Krugman, P. (1996). Confronting the mystery of urban hierarchy. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10 (4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1006/jjie.1996.0023

Marar, K. W. P. (1942). Census of India. Vol. IX: Assam tables. Simla: Government of India Press.

Meijers, E. (2007). From central place to network model: theory and evidence of a paradigm change. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98 (2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00394.x

Ovchinnikov, N. F. (2019). Conservation principles: conservation laws, symmetry, structure. Moscow: URSS, 334.

Parr, J. B. (1969). City hierarchies and the distribution of city size: a reconsideration of Beckmann’s contribution. Journal of Regional Science, 9 (2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1969.tb01337.x

Parr, J. B., & Denike, K. G. (1970). Theoretical Problems in Central Place Analysis. Economic Geography, 46 (4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.2307/142941

Preston, R. E. (1983). The dynamic component of Christaller’s central place theory and the theme of change in his research. The Canadian Geographer, 27 (1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1983.tb00677.x

Savateev, A. D., & Bokov, T. A. (2017). Houthis uprising in Yemen: shia-sunni confrontation as a factor of geopolitical shifts in the Middle East. Journal of the Institute for African Studies, 1, 105–123. (In Russ.)

Shuper, V. A. (1989). Deformation of central place systems in the formation of large urban agglomerations. Soviet Geography, 30 (1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00385417.1989.10640759

Shuper, V. A. (1995). Selforganization of urban settlement system. Moscow: Rossijskij otkrytyj universitet Publ., 168 (In Russ.)

Shuper, V. A. (1996). Principle of additionality and the central place theory. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 4, 88–94. (In Russ.)

Shuper, V. A., & Valesyan, A. L. (1999). Spatial structure of urban settlement systems: stability versus changeability. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 88 https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.2386

Sjøholt, P. (1984). Some problem areas in transferring central place theory to developing countries. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 38 (1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291958408552105

Sonis, M. (2005, August). Central place theory after Christaller and Lösch. Some further explorations. In memory of August Lösch, 15 October 1906 – 30 May 1945. In: Land use and water management in a sustainable network society. Paper presented at the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association (The Netherlands), Amsterdam, Louvain-la-Neuve (pp. 1–31). Retrieved from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/117389/1/ERSA2005_018.pdf

Valesyan, A. L. (1991). Oscillatory processes in central place systems. Izvestiya VGO, 123 (4), 371–372. (In Russ.)

Vazhenin, A. A. (1997). Evolutionary processes in settlement systems. Yekaterinburg: UrB RAS, 62. (In Russ.)

Vazhenin, А. А. (1999). Sustainability of the distribution of urban settlements in settlement systems. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 1, 55–59. (In Russ.)

Vazhenin, A. A. (2006). The influence of patterns change of settling process upon the description of settling systems. Regional'nye issledovanija, 3, 43–65. (In Russ.)

Vazhenin, A. A. (2010). Predemination of directions of settlement processes in self-organizing systems. In: L. M. Sintserov (ed.), Geography of world development, Is. 2 (pp. 195–206). Moscow: KMK. (In Russ.)

Vazhenin, A. A. (2020). The influence of urbanization on the German settlement pattern in the 19th and 20th century. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, 84 (5), 674–693. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556620050179 (In Russ.)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.2.009

Copyright (c) 2023 Ruslan V. Dmitriev, Stanislav A. Gorokhov, Maksim M. Agafoshin

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731