Exploring the Innovative Development of Russian Regions: A Spatial Regression Analysis Using the Cobb-Douglas Model

Ilya V. Naumov, Natalia L. Nikulina

Abstract


Relevance. Extensive research has focused on evaluating and modeling innovative processes in territorial systems. However, an underexplored aspect is the assessment of spatial effects resulting from neighboring territories and the modeling of inter-territorial interactions in enterprise innovation. The existing regression models have limitations in accounting for spatial effects, indicating the presence of unaccounted factors.

Research objective. This study aims to develop a methodological approach to evaluate the influence of factors on the dynamics of shipped innovative goods in Russian regions, taking into account spatial effects. Additionally, it aims to test the hypothesis that territories located near innovatively developing regions exhibit faster progress.

Data and methods. The study utilizes regression analysis of panel data, employing combined least squares, fixed effects, and random effects methods to evaluate the influence of enterprise costs on innovation, the number of research personnel (researchers and technicians), advanced production technologies developed and used, the number of research organizations, as well as the internal costs of fundamental and applied research and development on the volume of shipped innovative goods in Russian regions from 2000 to 2021. To account for spatial effects, spatial econometrics techniques such as Spatial Autoregressive (SAR) models considering spatial lag and Spatial Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (SAC) models considering both spatial lag and spatial error are employed. The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) with the White period weight matrix is used to address heteroscedasticity, and data transformation techniques including orthogonal deviations and the inclusion of dummy variables for each spatial unit and time period are applied.

Results. The study reveals deepening spatial heterogeneity in innovation processes during economic downturns, which smooth out during economic recovery. Regions with high and low concentrations of shipped innovative goods are identified. Regression analysis establishes the impact of various factors on shipped innovative goods. Spatial models utilizing the Cobb-Douglas SAR and SAC frameworks demonstrate positive spatial effects, wherein neighboring regions exert influence on innovative development. Regions with high enterprise innovation activity, including Moscow, St. Petersburg, and others, exhibit the highest spatial effects.

Conclusions. The innovative development of a single region depends not only on its own production factors but also on the innovative activity of enterprises in the surrounding regions. These findings highlight the importance of considering spatial effects in assessing and modeling regional innovation dynamics.


Keywords


spatial models (SAR, SAC), Cobb-Douglas model, spatial effects, regional innovative development, production factors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93-115.

Anselin, L., Syabri, I. & Smirnov, O. (2002). Visualizing Multivariate Spatial Correlation with Dynamically Linked Windows. Available at: http://europa.nvc.cs.vt.edu/~ctlu/Project/SoftwareTools/multi_lisa.pdf (date of access: 07.02.2023).

Belyaeva, A.V. (2012). The use of spatial models in the mass valuation of real estate objects. Computer Research and Modeling, 4(3), 639-650.

Benz, D.S. (2020). Specificity of long-term economic growth of the regions of the Urals and the Volga region. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 11(445), 93-102. DOI: 10.47475/1994-2796-2020-11111.

Bychkova, A.A. (2022). Optimization of directions of high-speed routes of the Russian railway in the regions. University Bulletin, 7, 82-89.

Chen, H., Yi, J., Chen, A., Peng, D. & Yang, J. (2023). Green technology innovation and CO2 emission in China: Evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a nonlinear spatial Durbin model. Energy Policy, 172, 113338. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113338.

Demidova, O.A. (2014). Spatial-autoregressive model for two groups of interconnected regions (on the example of the eastern and western parts of Russia). Applied Econometrics, 34(2), 19-35.

Gafarova, E.A. (2017). Empirical Models of Regional Economic Growth with Spatial Effects: Results of Comparative Analysis. Bulletin of the Perm University. Ser. "Economics" = Perm University Herald. Economy, 12(4), 561-574. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2017-4-561-574.

Geary, R. (1954). The continiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, 5, 115-145. DOI: 10.2307/2986645.

Getis, A. & Ord J.K. (1995). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical analysis, 27(4), 286-306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x.

Golovchanskaya, E.E., Strelchenya, E.I. & Petrenko, E.S. (2018). Assessing the impact of an intellectual resource on economic growth. Creative Economy, 12(10). 1599-1618. DOI: 10.18334/ce.12.10.39511.

Gorshkova, T. (2018). GRP forecasting using spatial correlation methods. Scientific Bulletin of the IEP Gaidar, 10, 37-47.

Grekusis, D. (2021). Methods and practice of spatial analysis. Description, exploration and explanation using GIS. Moscow: DMK Press, 500.

Ivanova, V.I. (2014). Regional convergence of household incomes: a spatial analysis. Spatial Economics, 4, 100-119. DOI: 10.14530/se.2014.4.100-119.

Ivanova, V.I. (2015). Price convergence in the grain market: a historical aspect. Spatial Economics, 3, 34-56.

Kaneva, M.A. & Untura, G.A. (2017). The evolution of theories and empirical models of the relationship between economic growth, science and innovation (part 1). World of Economics and Management, 17(4), 5-21.

Karim, A., Suhartono & Prastyo, D.D. (2020). Spatial Spillover Effect on Transportation Infrastructure On Regional Growth. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 16(3), 911-920. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-18.

Kholodilin, K.A., Oshchepkov, A. & Siliverstovs, B. (2012). The Russian Regional Convergence Process: Where is it Leading? Eastern European Economics, 50(3), 5-26. DOI: 10.2753/EEE0012-8775500301.

Kudryavtseva, S.S. & Shinkevich, A.I. (2016). Adaptive modeling of innovation activity of open national innovation systems. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 2(42), 39-48.

Lakman, I.A., Gorshechnikova, A.V., Shamsutdinova, N.K. & Prudnikov, V.B. (2019). Spatial modeling of human potential in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Statistics and Economics, 16(4), 35-44. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2019-4-35-44.

Li, G., Li, X.& Huo L. (2023). Digital economy, spatial spillover and industrial green innovation efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Heliyon, 9(1), e12875. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12875.

Li, Y., Tang, Y., Wang, K. & Zhao, Q. (2019). Environmental Regulation and China’s Regional Innovation Output – Empirical Research Based on Spatial Durbin Model. Sustainability, 11, 5602. DOI: 10.3390/su11205602.

Mariev, O.S., Ignatieva, E.D., Naberezhneva, E.P. & Savin, I.V. (2012). Econometric modeling of regional factors of innovative development of productive forces in the resource-dependent economy of Russia. Bulletin of UrFU. Series: Economics and Management, 5, 133-145.

Moran, P. (1948). The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 10, 243-251. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x.

Naumov, I.V., Dubrovskaya, Yu.V. & Kozonogova, E.V. (2020). Digitalization of industrial production in the regions of Russia. Spatial relationships. Economy of Region, 16(3), 896-910. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020–3-17.

Naumov, I.V., Krasnykh, S.S. & Otmakhova Y.S. (2021). A spatial autocorrelation for modelling the spread of coronavirus infections. SHS Web of Conferences, 106, 01001:1-7. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202110601001.

Rusanovsky, V.A. & Markov, V.A. (2016). Influence of the spatial factor on the regional differentiation of unemployment in the Russian economy. Forecasting Problems, 5, 144-157.

Semerikova, E.V. & Demidova, O.A. (2015). Analysis of regional unemployment in Russia and Germany: a spatial econometric approach. Spatial Economics, 2, 64-85. DOI: 10.14530/se.2015.2.064-085.

Solow, R.M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.

Timiryanova, V.M. (2020). Assessment of the spatial dependence of the volume of shipped products in dynamics. Statistics and Economics, 17(5), 49-58. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2020-5-49-58.

Vakulenko, E.S. (2013). Does population migration lead to inter-regional convergence in Russia? Bulletin of NSUEM, 4, 239-264.

Yang, P., Fan, M., Li, Z., Cao, J., Wu, X., Wu, D. & Lu, Z. (2022). Digital finance, spatial spillover and regional innovation efficiency: New insights from China. Electronic Research Archive, 30(12), 4635-4656. DOI: 10.3934/era.2022235/.

Zverev, D.V. & Kolomak, E.A. (2010). Subfederal fiscal policy in Russia: interregional differences and connections. Series "Scientific reports: independent economic analysis", 214. M.: Moscow public scientific fund; Siberian Center for Applied Economic Research, 160.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.2.014

Copyright (c) 2023 Ilya V. Naumov, Natalia L. Nikulina

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731