Strengthening fiscal decentralization in Russia: causes of the 2020 failure and prospective directions
Abstract
Relevance. Strengthening fiscal decentralization is viewed as a crucial strategy to foster the economic development of Russian regions.
Research Objective. The research aims to assess the potential impact of redistributing tax revenues, particularly VAT, among various budget levels.
Data and Methods. The study employs regression analysis to investigate the correlation between the Gross Regional Product (GRP) of Russian regions and the expenditures of their consolidated budgets. A comparative analysis is also conducted, using data from the Federal Tax Service on VAT receipts to the federal budget and data from the Federal State Statistics Service on GRP and expenditure components of regional budgets from 2005 to 2021.
Results. The research confirms the Russian government’s concerns regarding a possible increase in economic disparities if 40% of VAT is shifted to sub-federal levels. It reveals the negative impact that such a measure would have on specific regions. Instead, a more promising approach is to implement a special budgetary regime in select regions to stimulate their development.
Conclusions. The study showcases adverse effects associated with transferring 40% of VAT to the sub-federal level. It proposes a mechanism to enhance fiscal decentralization in Russia, aiming to advance regional economic development, address economic disparities among regions, and offset any potential reduction in federal budget revenues.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aganbegyan, A. G. (2019). What regions can do to overcome stagnation and initiate significant so-cio-economic growth. Region: Economics and Sociology, 4, 3-23. DOI: 10.15372/REG20190401. (In Russ.)
Baklaeva, N.M. (2017). Challenges in advancing the economic interests of regions as participants in interbudgetary relations in crisis conditions. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 15 (1), 35-49. DOI: 10.24891/re.15.1.35. (In Russ.)
Bogacheva, O.V. (1996). Budgetary mechanisms in global development practice for depressed and underdeveloped regions. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 6, 100-112. (In Russ.)
Bonet J., Ayala J. (2015). Transferencias intergubernamentales y disparidades fiscales horizontales en Colombia. Revista del Banco de la República, 88 (1058), 17-32.
Bulochnikov, P.A., Smirnov, K. B. (2019). Interregional differentiation of spatial development in the regions of the Russian Federation. Petersburg Economic Journal, 4, 68-75. DOI: 10.25631/PEJ.2019.4.68.75. (In Russ.)
Davoodi H., Zou H. (1998). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics, 43 (2), 244-257. DOI:10.1006/JUEC.1997.2042.
Devarajan S., Swaroop V., Zou H. (1997). The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37 (2), 313-344. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3932(96)90039-2.
Fan C.S., Lin C., Treisman D. (2009). Political decentralization and corruption: evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93 (1-2), 14-34. DOI: 10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2008.09.001.
Fayol H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale. Paris: Dunod et Pinat, 174.
Foremny D., Sacchi A., Salotti S. (2017). Decentralization and the duration of fiscal consolidation: shifting the burden across layers of government. Public Choice, 171 (3-4), 359-387. DOI 10.1007/s11127-017-0441-0.
Hallet A. H. (2017). Fiscal autonomy vs. fiscal federalism in the euro zone. Economia Politica, 34 (2), 179-188. DOI: 10.1007/s40888-017-0066-2.
Ilyin, V. A., Povarova, A. I. (2014). Problems of regional development as a reflection of the effec-tiveness of state governance. Economy of Regions, 3, 48-63. DOI: 10.17059/2014-3-4. (In Russ.)
Kulikov, N.I., Kulikov, A. N. (2017). Differences in socio-economic development of Russian regions: assessment and the reality of equalization.¬ Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 15 (12), 2190-2209. DOI: 10.24891/re.15.12.2190. (In Russ.)
Kyriacou A. P., Muinelo-Gallo L., Roca-Sagalés O. (2017). Regional inequalities, fiscal decentraliza-tion and government quality. Regional Studies, 51 (6), 945-957. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1150992.
Leonov, S.N. (2023). Reactions of municipal budgets to state regulatory measures: assessment methodology.Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 16 (4), 168-185. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.9. (In Russ.)
Liu L. (2021). Fiscal decentralization and the imbalance between consumption and investment in China. The Annals of Regional Science, 66 (1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-020-01006-1.
Marattin L., Nannicini T., Porcelli F. (2022). Revenue vs expenditure based fiscal consolidation: the pass-through from federal cuts to local taxes. International Tax and Public Finance, 29 (4), 834-872. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-021-09682-1.
Nirola N., Sahu, S., Choudhury, A. (2022). Fiscal decentralization, regional disparity, and the role of corruption. The Annals of Regional Science, 68 (3), 757-787. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-021-01102-w.
Oates W. E. (1999). An Easy on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (3), 1120-1149. DOI:10.1257/JEL.37.3.1120.
Olayungbo D. O., Olayemi O. F. (2018). Dynamic relationships among non-oil revenue, government spending and economic growth in an oil producing country: Evidence from Nigeria. Future Business Jour-nal, 4 (2), 246-260. DOI:10.1016/j.fbj.2018.07.002.
Pechenskaya-Polishchuk, M.A. (2021) The influence of processes of centralization and decentrali-zation on the formation of the tax potential of territories. Economy of Regions, 17 (2), 658-672. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-22. (In Russ.)
Prud’homme R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. The World Bank research observer, 10 (2), 201-220. DOI:10.1093/WBRO/10.2.201.
Pyankova, S.G., Kombarov, M.A. (2022). Disparities in the spatial development of Russia and its economic regions: choosing an accurate and appropriate assessment method and methods of mitigation. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15 (3), 75-90. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.4. (In Russ.)
Pyankova, S.G., Kombarov, M.A. (2023). The problem of development gaps in the economic space of Russia and ways to address it. Problems of Territory’s Development , 27 (1), 10-26. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2023.1.123.2. (In Russ.)
Sharma C. K. (2005). The Federal Approach to Fiscal Decentralisation: Conceptual Contours for Poli-cy Makers. Loyola Journal of Social Sciences, 19 (2), 169-188.
Tatarkin, A. I. (2014). Dialectics of state and market regulation in the socio-economic development of regions and municipalities. Economy of Regions, 1, 9-33. DOI: 10.17059/2014-1-1. (In Russ.)
Tiebout C. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5), 416-424. DOI:10.1086/257839.
Wiryawan B. A., Otchia C. (2022). The legacy of the reformasi: the role of local government spend-ing on industrial development in a decentralized Indonesia. Journal of Economic Structures, 11 (3), 1-19. DOI: 10.1186/s40008-022-00262-y.
Yakovenko, I. V. (2021). Mathematical models of implementing the concept of rigid budget con-straints in the budgetary system. Finance: Theory and Practice, 25 (3), 6-19. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-3-6-19. (In Russ.)
Yushkov, A. O., Oding, N.Y., Savulkin, L. I. (2018). Subsidized regions of Russia: scenarios for increas-ing budgetary revenues.Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 46-65. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-46-65. (In Russ.)
Zhang X. (2006). Fiscal Decentralization and Political Centralization in China: Implications for Growth and Inequality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34 (4), 713-726. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2006.08.006.
Zhuravskaya E. V. (2000). Incentives to provide local public goods: fiscal fede¬ralism, Russian style. Journal of Public Economics, 76 (3), 337-368. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00090-0.
Zubarevich, N.V. (2014) Regional development and regional policy in Russia. ECO, 4, 6-27. (In Russ.)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2024.10.1.006
Copyright (c) 2024 Svetlana G. Pyankova, Mikhail A. Kombarov
Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731