Industrial development amid economic turbulence: strategic guidelines for single-industry regions

Natalya V. Pravdina, Irina V. Danilova, Alexandr V. Rezepin

Abstract


Relevance. External shocks can disrupt stable industrial development and technological modernization, especially in open single-industry regions that are highly vulnerable to global market fluctuations. The dominance of a single sector results in structural inertia, making it difficult for these regions to shift their economic trajectory. This path dependence amplifies the risks posed by economic turbulence, highlighting the need for changes in the economic structure and strategic guidelines for regional industrial policies.

Objective. This study aims to describe the current, strategic, and future development paths for single-industry regions amid economic turbulence. It focuses on changes in the industrial profiles of metallurgical regions in Russia, including Lipetsk, Vologda, Murmansk, Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, and Krasnoyarsk.

Data and methods. The research uses publicly available statistics from 2008 to 2021, grounded in regional development theory. Methodologically, the study relies on coefficient analysis, positional-dynamic analysis, and assessment of technological connections between sectors.

Results. The study has detected significant differences in regional adaptation: Lipetsk and Chelyabinsk are shifting towards low-tech sectors, Sverdlovsk maintains its metallurgical focus, Vologda is balancing metallurgy and a medium-high-tech chemical industry, while Murmansk and Krasnoyarsk are transforming with a focus on low-tech mineral extraction. Promising specializations include machine engineering in Sverdlovsk and Vologda, as well as machine engineering and electrical equipment production in Lipetsk and Chelyabinsk. However, we found discrepancies between the declared strategic goals and actual priorities in Lipetsk and Chelyabinsk.

Conclusions. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and authorities, helping to update strategies for fostering the growth of promising industrial sectors.


Keywords


economic turbulence, single-industry regions, industrial structure, technological relatedness of industries, industrial profile, development strategy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andreoni, А. (2021). Robustness to shocks, readiness to change and new pathways for resilient industrialization. Department of policy, research and statistics working paper. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.

Astafieva, O.V., Astafiev, E. V. (2018). The characteristics of the development of regional economic systems with a single-industry focus. Management Sciences, Vol. 8, № 1, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2018-8-1-62-71 (In Russ.)

Auzan, A. A. (2015). "Path Dependence" The problem of reliance on previous development trajectories – the evolution of hypotheses. Journal of Moscow State Regional University, Series 6, Economics,1, 3-15. (In Russ.)

Bathelt, H., Boggs, J.S. (2003). Towards a reconceptualisation of regional development paths: Is Leipzig ‘s media cluster a continuation of or a rupture with the past? Economic Geography, 79 (3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00212.x

Boschma, R. (2010). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Conference on "Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology" at Imperial College London Business School, June 16 - 18, 2010.

Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481

Boschma, R., Neffke, F., Henning, M. (2010). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology. Summer Conference at Imperial College London Business School.

Danilova, I.V., Pravdina, N.V. (2023). Indicators for unlocking the development trajectory of single-industry regions in Russia. Bulletin of the South Ural State University, 17 (1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.14529/em230102 9 9 (In Russ.)

Davies, A., & Tonts, M. (2010). Economic diversity and regional socio-economic performance. Geographical Research, 48 (3), 223–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00627.x

Dawley, S., Pike A. & Tomaney, J. (2010). Towards the resilient region? Local Economy 25(8): 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690942.2010.533424

Dissart, J.C. (2003). Regional economic diversity and regional economic stability: Research results and agenda. International Regional Science Review, 26 (4), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017603259083

Eferin, Y. Yu., Kutsenko, E. S. (2021). Adapting the smart specialization concept for the development of Russia's regions. Public Administration Issues, № 3, 75–110. (In Russ.)

Eriksson, R.H. & Hane-Weijman, E. (2017). How do regional economies respond to crises? The geography of job creation and destruction in Sweden (1990–2010). European Urban and Regional Studies. Vol. 24(1) 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415604016

Frenken, K. & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm018

Frenken, K., van Oort, F. & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120296

Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B. & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: the unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012

Hausmann, R. & Hidalgo, C.A. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16 (4), 309–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9071-4

Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial Development in Thin Regions: Trapped in Path Extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15 (3), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu026

Isaksen, A. & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Innovation Drivers and Regional Innovation Strategies, 66–84. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671475

Kogler, D.F. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: a research agenda. Regional Studies, 51, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1276282

Kozonogova, E.V., Tsekhmister, N.A. (2022). A methodology for determining the sectoral development strategy of regions based on the concept of path dependence. Bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management, 4, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.24866/2311-2271/2022-4/28-46 (In Russ.)

Kotlyarova, S. N. & Shamova, E. A. (2023). Development Trends and Dynamics of Industrial Specialization in Russian Regions. R-Economy. 9(4). 384–404. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.4.024.

Krekotnev, S.A. (2018). Cities and regions with single-industry specialization as an object of public policy: in search of classification criteria. Journal of Moscow State Regional University, № 1, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2018-1-857 (In Russ.)

Kuznetsova, A. L., Zverev, Yu.M. (2019). The 'path dependence effect' and its application in regional studies (a case study of Kaliningrad region). Regionalnye issledovaniya, 2 (64), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2019-2-2 (In Russ.)

Martin, R. & Sunly, P. (2006). Path dependency and regional economic evolution. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 6 (4), 395–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl012

Moriset, B. (2009). A high-tech cluster revisited: An evolutionary perspective on Grenoble, France. Economie et geographie de l’innovation et de la creativite, University of Lille.

Neffke, F., Henning, M. & Boschma, R. (2011). How Do Regions Diversify Over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions. Economic Geography. 87 (3): 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x

Nemchenko, G. I., Stepanov, E. D. (2012). On the issue of defining monotowns and monoregions. Conference Proceedings: 'Current Issues in the Humanities', Tomsk, 426-430. (In Russ.)

Ormerod, P. (2010). Resilience after local economic shocks. Applied Economics Letters 17(5), 503-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850801964331

Pike, A., Dawley, S. & Tomaney, J. (2010). Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3 (1), 59–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsq001

Pyankova, S.G. (2016). Prospective areas for the socio-economic development of single-industry municipalities Upravlenets, № 2, 44-49. (In Russ.)

Rastvortseva, S.N., Amanalieva, A. B. (2020). Analysis of national innovation systems based on the technological proximity method. Economic Theory, Economic Education and Digital Economy, 17 (4), 781–788. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-4.3 (In Russ.)

Simachev, Yu. V., Fedyunina, A. A., Kuzyk, M.G. (2022). New contours of industrial policy. Proceedings of the XXIII Yasin (April) International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development, Moscow, 73 p. (In Russ.)

Simmie, J. & Martin, R. L. (2010). The Economic Resilience of Regions: Towards an Evolutionary Approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. vol.3. pp. 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp029

Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. (2004). Like Phoenix from the ashes? The renewal of clusters in old industrial areas. Urban Studies 41(5–6): 1175–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098041000167578

Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of Regional Innovation Systems: From Old Leagacies to New Development Paths. Reframing Regional Development. Evolution, Innovation and Transition, ed. by P. Cooke. 297–317.

Zaynutdinov, R.R. (2015). Single-industry regions of Russia: definition, typology, and development prospects. Economy of regions, №4, 106-122. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-4-9 (In Russ.)

Zhu, S., He, C., & Zhou, Y. (2017). How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space. Journal of Economic Geography, 17 (3), 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw047




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2024.10.3.021

Copyright (c) 2024 Natalya V. Pravdina, Irina V. Danilova, Alexandr V. Rezepin

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731