Causal analysis of the interinfluence of workforce productivity and rail freight intensity in the regions of the Ural Federal District

Mikhail B. Petrov, Leonid A. Serkov, Kseniya A. Zavyalova

Abstract


Relevance. The development of the railway industry has a significant positive impact on socio-economic dynamics at both the state and regional levels, which has been confirmed by numerous domestic and foreign studies. However, the issue of mutual influence of such categories as regional labour productivity and rail freight intensity has been little studied. At the same time, the most important task today is to find effective incentives for the growth of regional labour productivity.

Research Objective. This study aims to econometric analysis of the relationship between rail freight intensity and workforce productivity in the Ural Federal District (UFD).

Data and Methods. The study uses official statistical data on Russian regions provided by the Federal State Statistics Service. The methods of Vector Error Correction Models (VECM) and pooled mean group estimates (PMG method) formed the methodological basis of the study.

Results. The study has shown that there is a relationship between workforce productivity and rail freight intensity. At that point, in a short-term period growth of rail freight intensity leads to an increase in workforce productivity, which in a long-term period itself becomes an incentive to increase the shipped commodity mass and rail freight intensity.

Conclusions. The findings can be of interest to public authorities at the national and regional levels, for heads of industrial structures and functional institutions, representatives of business and scientific communities interested in the development and modernization of transport infrastructure, being a basic condition for the increased intensity of cargo transportation in the region.


Keywords


regional development, regional transportation system, workforce productivity, rail freight intensity, vector error correction models (VECM), method of pooled mean group estimates (PMG method)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afonso, A.; Jalles, J.T. (2015) Fiscal sustainability: A panel assessment for advanced economies. Appl. Econ. Lett. 22, 925–929.

Afonso, A.; Jalles, J.T. (2016) The elusive character of fiscal sustainability. Appl. Econ. 48, 2651–2664.

Aschauer D.A. (1989). Public investment and productivity growth in the group of seven. Econ. Perspect. 13 (5), 17-25.

Belloumi, M. (2016) Decomposing the influencing factors of energy consumption in Tunisian transportation sector using the LMDI method. Transp. Policy. 52, 64–71.

Canagarajah, S.; Brownbridge, M.; Paliu, A.; Dumitru, I. (2012) The Challenges to Long Run Fiscal Sustainability in Romania. Policy Research Working Paper. 5927; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.

Dumitrescu E., Hurlin C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling. 29, 1450–1460.

Eisner R. (1991). Infrastructure and Regional Economic Performance. New England Economic Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. 47-58, V. 18 (2), 308-322.

Feld, L.P.; Köhler, E.A.; Wolfinger, J. (2020) Modeling fiscal sustainability in dynamic macro-panels with heterogeneous effects: Evidence from German federal states. Int. Tax Public Financ. 27, 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-019-09548-7

Granger C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 37, 424–438.

Hadri K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal. 3, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00043

Kolomak E.A. (2020). Spatial Development of Modern Russia: Trends, Factors, Mechanisms, Institutions. - Novosibirsk: Publishing house of IEIE SB RAS. 502 с. ISBN 978-5-89665-352-3.

Liang, Y., Niu, D., Wang, H., Li, Y. (2017) Factors Affecting Transportation Sector CO2 Emissions Growth in China: An LMDI Decomposition Analysis. Sustainability. 9, 1730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101730

Liu W., Li W., Huang W. (2006). Analysis of the dynamic relation between logistics development and GDP growth in China. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics. SOLI, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2006.329054

Liu, Z., Li, L., Zhang, Y.-J. (2015) Investigating the CO2 emission differences among China’s transport sectors and their influencing factors. Nat. Hazards. 77, 1323–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1657-2

Lv, W., Hong, X., Fang, K. (2015) Chinese regional energy efficiency change and its determinants analysis: Malmquist index and Tobit model. Annals of Operations Research. 228, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1007 / s10479-012-1094-5

Mak B. Arvin, Rudra P. Pradhan, Neville R. Norman. (2015). Transportation intensity, urbanization, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in the G-20 countries. Utilities Policy. Vol.35, 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2015.07.003

Macheret, D.A. (2016). As evidenced by the century-long performance of major railway networks. Economic Policy. 6, 138 -169. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2016-6-07

Petrov M.B., Serkov L.A., Kozhov K.B. (2021). Modelling causal relationships between railway network efficiency and labour productivity in Russia. Journal of Economic Theory. 18 (2), 308-322. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-2.12

Paniagua, J.; Sapena, J.; Tamarit, C. (2017) Fiscal sustainability in EMU countries: A continued fiscal commitment? Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money. 50(4), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.014

Payne, J.E. (1997) International evidence on the sustainability of budget deficits. Appl. Econ. Lett. 4, 775–779.

Pedroni P. (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressor. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 61, 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653

Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073

Pesaran M. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 22, 265–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.457280

Pesaran M. H., Shin Y., Smith R. P., Pesaran M. H. Shin Y., Smith R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 94(446), 621–634.

Pradhan Rudra P., Bagchi, Tapan P. (2013). Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: The VECM approach. Research in Transportation Economics. 38, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.008

Quintos, C. (1995) Sustainability of the deficit process with structural shifts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 13, 409–417.

Rakhmangulov A. N., Kopylova O. А. (2014). Assessing the socio-economic potential of a region to locate logistics infrastructure facilities. Regional Economy. 2, 254-263.

Seo, M.H.; Shin, Y. (2016) Dynamic panels with threshold effect and endogeneity. Journal of Econometrics. 195, 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.005

Shi, H., Yang, W., Chen, X. (2013) Econometrics analysis on the impact of various means of transportation on China’s total ton-km volume. Mark. Mod. 18, 195–196.

Xu, B., Lin, B. (2016) Differences in regional emissions in China’s transport sector: Determinants and reduction strategies. Energy. 95, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.016

Yuan, C., Wu, D., Liu, H. (2017) Using Grey Relational Analysis to Evaluate Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Growth Patterns in China’s Provincial Transportation Sectors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 14, 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121536




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.3.019

Copyright (c) 2023 Mikhail B. Petrov, Leonid A. Serkov, Kseniya A. Zavyalova

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731